Active Users:159 Time:19/03/2024 08:05:44 AM
Re: basically p hart - 21/04/2004 10:43:31 AM

and the little put down about countryman being on yank land. You took his side on the issue and you called it reasoned. To me reasoned is not launching into a diatribe against someone. You also apparently didn't understand chora's arguments which were not in any way unreasoned. You associate yourself with WW. You also then say I am being stupid by defending chora. My whole post was about hte word MAY that chora had used. If my post was so stupid then you were basically saying that the word MAY was innapropriate and should not have been used. That is not just what I alone got out of that post. If you did not mean that then too bad that is the definite impression that people got. And of course you wouldn't apologise for htat.Ok the yank land was a joke, you being very anti-american and still standing up for your buddy.Personally now that i look at it closer i think chora just got a taste of his own medicine.I wouldn't really say im associating myself with WW, everyone we agree with we are now associating with?OK you using swearing and jumping in was stupid THATS what i meant, if you took it another way, i do apologise(seriously) and i would have even if you hadn't called me on it at the end there.

on another note, I wasn't trying to flame anyone here. I'll restate that again for your benefit.Cheers.

which post? The one where you called me stupid? I mis interpreted that did I? You thought it was wrong but coming from WW it was reasoned? Unbelievable! This whole diatribe of yours here is unbelievable. writing a serious post and 45 mins later writing a drrunk one? When was this? More htan likely I was drunk when I wrote the first one, but if I really put in the effort, if I put it through a spell check then it can come out halfway decent. My memory of whatever I have typed the next day is more than a bit hazy.No No the post ages ago, it doesn't matter now.It was yesterday you said about the sweat stains, then typed one about burping pasta.again it doesn't matter.

your grudges? I do have a few friends on msn and I pointed it out to one. There was snoopster, chora, myself and someone else yes.Fair enough, in future i would suggest your time could be spent better discussing something else.As im sure you will agree i'm not really worth that much discussion over 3 maybe even 4 continents.I didn't realise you guys were so paranoid.

as I already said, with your post you left yourself open to others believing that you were having a go at chora as well. You felt free to jump in against me there and yet WW doing it is perfectly reasoned. I've already explained this.When did WW jump in agaisnt you?Before you jumped in agaisnt him.i will apologise for any misunderstanding in my post again.

you really are letting your dislike of me and chora get in the way here. The whole diatribe in this post only proves my point. Hardly, chora as i have said before doesn't bother me, his miow factor is amusing.

oh and your words here......... 'I was just Saying that WW made fair points and i thought chora was being a unfair on him, i never said anything about the MAY thing?' How was chora being unfair on him when he went and attacked chora for his reply to snoopster?The incidents where chora used his less eloquent side to call him a spent condom etc.


"Sorry. Can't stand reflexive used as a subject."

Funniest thing me and my mates have ever heard/seen.

No one would set up a firing squad just to give people a job




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Evidence apart from the Bible of Jesus - 17/04/2004 10:11:22 AM 503 Views
Why? - 17/04/2004 10:39:29 AM 61 Views
Pays to know your competition - 17/04/2004 10:41:02 AM 1 Views
*shakes head sadly* - 17/04/2004 10:41:15 AM 1 Views
I blame that pom - 17/04/2004 11:12:30 AM 1 Views
I've posted twenty odd sources to get you started. - 17/04/2004 11:38:02 AM 89 Views
(Blank subject) - 17/04/2004 12:09:24 PM 59 Views
It really should read Jesus of the Bible as the Bible is not - 17/04/2004 01:07:26 PM 54 Views
Your sources are misleading... - 17/04/2004 01:23:14 PM 1 Views
Thank you - 17/04/2004 01:39:48 PM 1 Views
Thanks *NM* - 17/04/2004 01:40:12 PM 1 Views
Thanks - 17/04/2004 01:41:14 PM 1 Views
Actually, I just missed out my commas - 17/04/2004 01:46:03 PM 1 Views
There are no contemporary, non-Christian records whatsoever - 17/04/2004 02:08:14 PM 1 Views
Tacitus wrote at 100 AD--almost certainly just repeating a story. - 17/04/2004 03:38:02 PM 1 Views
There are none from his time. - 17/04/2004 03:41:46 PM 1 Views
Especialyl when you consider - 17/04/2004 03:46:12 PM 1 Views
You're so... English. - 17/04/2004 05:52:33 PM 1 Views
Meh. - 17/04/2004 06:05:30 PM 1 Views
Sans those details, what do you have? - 17/04/2004 06:12:41 PM 1 Views
- 17/04/2004 07:15:33 PM 1 Views
True enough - 17/04/2004 07:18:04 PM 1 Views
Re: Your sources are misleading... - 17/04/2004 07:23:44 PM 1 Views
But contemporary info is what's important. - 17/04/2004 07:42:46 PM 1 Views
You haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about - 17/04/2004 07:55:47 PM 1 Views
and your dumb ass opinion flies in the face of every historical - 17/04/2004 08:08:50 PM 1 Views
He asked for outside sources... - 17/04/2004 08:17:03 PM 1 Views
Well, not EVERYONE... - 17/04/2004 08:25:15 PM 1 Views
Thanks for the unsubstantiated insults. - 17/04/2004 08:25:58 PM 1 Views
Fair enough, not literally "everyone." *NM* - 17/04/2004 08:27:17 PM 1 Views
They are simply truths - 17/04/2004 08:31:34 PM 1 Views
Let's put it this way: - 17/04/2004 08:35:30 PM 1 Views
josefis - 17/04/2004 09:17:43 PM 22 Views
Josephus... - 17/04/2004 09:21:30 PM 1 Views
Is it that time of the month? (yes you profile says male) - 17/04/2004 10:21:30 PM 1 Views
Furthermore here is a link that shows my statement - 17/04/2004 10:23:28 PM 1 Views
Furthermore why the hostility to a statement? - 17/04/2004 10:24:49 PM 1 Views
Furthermore I must state youre a spent condom. - 17/04/2004 10:25:12 PM 1 Views
Well, it is not a belief that appears to be held by mainstream - 17/04/2004 11:03:24 PM 1 Views
Of course 18th century - 17/04/2004 11:14:24 PM 1 Views
f*ck you're an idiot - 17/04/2004 11:47:37 PM 1 Views
You have done academic work for a journal edited - 17/04/2004 11:57:06 PM 1 Views
Never mind. *NM* - 18/04/2004 12:05:37 AM 1 Views
My speciality was 1500-1900 years after 30 CE/AD, but... - 18/04/2004 12:53:02 AM 45 Views
It does make sense (edit) - 18/04/2004 12:55:20 AM 1 Views
so many edits *NM* - 18/04/2004 01:05:18 AM 1 Views
On account of the debate regarding the 'historicity of Jesus' - 18/04/2004 01:41:10 AM 31 Views
Well...yes. *NM* - 18/04/2004 01:42:33 AM 1 Views
Re: You have done academic work for a journal edited - 18/04/2004 08:57:13 AM 1 Views
Re: Let's put it this way: - 18/04/2004 09:05:50 AM 1 Views
Re: f*ck you're an idiot - 18/04/2004 09:08:41 AM 1 Views
What you wrote makes lots of sense. *NM* - 18/04/2004 09:11:02 AM 1 Views
Re: He asked for outside sources... - 18/04/2004 09:24:39 AM 1 Views
I actually thought WW was reasoned and made good points. - 18/04/2004 09:32:13 AM 1 Views
Dear Weirmon and Logic Ninja, may I interuppt this a moment? - 18/04/2004 12:48:31 PM 1 Views
Very nice. ~applauds~ *NM* - 18/04/2004 03:03:50 PM 1 Views
I can't draw a conclusion without a PhD? - 18/04/2004 03:12:38 PM 1 Views
A completely useless exercise. - 18/04/2004 03:30:34 PM 35 Views
Melodrama does not suit you. Try being less flamboyant. *NM* - 18/04/2004 04:54:14 PM 1 Views
Youre a moron. *NM* - 18/04/2004 04:55:24 PM 1 Views
Youre the one who began with the insults. Remember that. - 18/04/2004 04:56:23 PM 1 Views
No wonder the Scottish lost to the English. - 18/04/2004 04:58:13 PM 1 Views
Ignorant? - 18/04/2004 04:59:22 PM 1 Views
Obviously all the intelligent Scots immigrated to the US *NM* - 18/04/2004 05:00:18 PM 1 Views
do you understand the meaning of the word may? - 18/04/2004 05:05:21 PM 1 Views
Not all historians - 18/04/2004 05:10:16 PM 1 Views
here's why you are an idiot - 18/04/2004 05:14:05 PM 1 Views
Thing is... - 18/04/2004 06:25:05 PM 1 Views
You were not insulting. - 18/04/2004 06:49:01 PM 1 Views
You are leaning towards racism, here. - 18/04/2004 06:53:23 PM 1 Views
Oh, you were plenty insulting. - 18/04/2004 07:06:38 PM 1 Views
An insult for an insult. - 18/04/2004 07:13:33 PM 1 Views
Leave now. - 18/04/2004 07:14:27 PM 1 Views
The statement linked his intelligence to race - 18/04/2004 07:22:23 PM 1 Views
That's a pretty pointless approach. - 18/04/2004 07:39:46 PM 1 Views
I see it as creating balance within the world. *NM* - 18/04/2004 11:11:34 PM 1 Views
He is the same race as me - white. - 18/04/2004 11:13:52 PM 1 Views
That's a minor technicality - 18/04/2004 11:48:54 PM 1 Views
I have tried to be patient with you - 19/04/2004 01:16:44 AM 1 Views
By all means, tolerate - 19/04/2004 02:02:25 AM 1 Views
Thank you - 19/04/2004 05:10:09 AM 1 Views
I hate to say it - 19/04/2004 05:19:59 AM 1 Views
Don't be a complete moron - 19/04/2004 05:21:38 AM 1 Views
Not for me it isn't - 19/04/2004 05:34:44 AM 1 Views
He has greatly influenced history - 19/04/2004 05:36:11 AM 1 Views
Some source are certainly stronger than others - 19/04/2004 08:29:49 AM 1 Views
Not threatened at all by the possibility - 19/04/2004 08:35:33 AM 1 Views
*Takes counsel to heart* - 19/04/2004 08:39:16 AM 1 Views
Re: Thing is... - 19/04/2004 11:31:27 AM 1 Views
lol - 19/04/2004 01:06:56 PM 1 Views
lol *NM* - 19/04/2004 01:07:40 PM 1 Views
Re: Yeah... - 19/04/2004 01:08:43 PM 1 Views
I dont see it as racism,but who says im white? - 19/04/2004 01:10:54 PM 1 Views
I appreciate what your doing, but as i said in a previous post - 19/04/2004 01:17:50 PM 1 Views
... - 19/04/2004 01:39:43 PM 1 Views
Hardly - 19/04/2004 01:47:10 PM 1 Views
Your friend is going to lose that argument - 19/04/2004 03:57:05 PM 1 Views
you're in the wrong here - 19/04/2004 08:27:42 PM 1 Views
oh dear - 19/04/2004 08:32:55 PM 1 Views
perhaps - 19/04/2004 08:35:17 PM 1 Views
A good point, for the sake of the knowledge itself - 19/04/2004 09:48:46 PM 1 Views
Well, it does not have so much do with you as to - 19/04/2004 09:50:04 PM 1 Views
that's not how it looks to me - 20/04/2004 05:51:31 AM 1 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 20/04/2004 11:56:04 AM 1 Views
I never responded to chora.. - 20/04/2004 12:00:18 PM 1 Views
Ok... - 20/04/2004 12:11:10 PM 1 Views
Re: that's not how it looks to me - 20/04/2004 12:16:58 PM 1 Views
yes oh dear. - 20/04/2004 01:44:42 PM 1 Views
basically - 20/04/2004 09:12:52 PM 1 Views
you are wrong - 20/04/2004 09:15:27 PM 1 Views
your bias - 20/04/2004 09:28:49 PM 1 Views
Ok im not too keen on this going on further. - 21/04/2004 10:33:52 AM 1 Views
Re: basically - 21/04/2004 10:43:31 AM 1 Views
Re: your bias - 21/04/2004 10:48:39 AM 1 Views
you're pathetic - 21/04/2004 07:00:30 PM 1 Views
that's because you're in the wrong - 21/04/2004 07:04:50 PM 1 Views
I used to respect your opinion - 22/04/2004 12:12:12 AM 1 Views
You are a pinnacle of academic professionalism and reason - 22/04/2004 12:14:07 AM 1 Views
Headline: Wannabe Academic Throws Hissy Fit *NM* - 22/04/2004 12:18:07 AM 1 Views
Hardly. - 22/04/2004 09:55:35 AM 1 Views
Would you want me to lie? - 22/04/2004 09:58:14 AM 1 Views