Active Users:114 Time:11/12/2018 02:18:15 PM
Lunar base options divide experts Chorabliss - 09/04/2004 12:56:49 PM

Lunar base options divide experts

By Dr David Whitehouse

Scientists are divided about the use of the Moon as a base to develop ways to travel to Mars, according to reports given to the US government.
Some have said the possibility of water-ice existing at the lunar poles would allow a moonbase to use the ice as rocket fuel for a Mars mission.

Others contend that it would be too difficult to extract.

And there is disagreement about whether the moon is a good alternative to space as a base for advanced telescopes.

In January, President Bush redirected the US space effort sending astronauts back to the Moon and then onto Mars.

Dirt and gravity

As the US prepares for its new direction in space a series of testimonies presented to it at a hearing entitled "Lunar Science and Resources," shows how opinion is divided when it comes to using water-ice discovered at the lunar poles as rocket fuel, and even in the value of the Moon as a base for scientific research.

"The discovery of accessible deposits of water on the Moon would profoundly affect the economics and viability of a lunar base," said Cornell University astronomer Donald Campbell.

But he added that recovering water deposits will not be an easy task, since they are likely to exist in the bottoms of very cold, permanently dark craters at the Moon's poles.

Meanwhile, Daniel Lester of the McDonald Observatory, University of Texas was not keen on using the Moon as a base for advanced astronomical telescopes. He believes space telescopes are better.

"In comparison to zero-g sites in free space the Moon, as a telescope platform, offers mainly dirt and gravity," he said.

"While dirt has been viewed by some as providing harvestable resources, it also translates into serious performance liabilities."

Dr Lester maintains that surface dust kicked up by both meteorites and activity near the telescope (whether blast waves from rockets or footsteps of astronauts) will degrade optical surfaces and reduce performance of loaded mechanical bearings on which such lunar telescopes would critically depend for precision motions.

"In short, we should ask whether dirt and gravity offer any general value to astronomy. The answer, I believe, is no."

He is also unimpressed by claims that the far side of the Moon is scientifically important as a radio-quiet site because on that hemisphere of the Moon there is never a line-of-sight to the Earth, so the strong human radio traffic and natural radio emission from our planet cannot interfere with astronomical observations.

"While this is potentially enabling, the scientific need for such a radio quiet site has never been entirely persuasive," he said.

A testing ground?

Paul Spudis of the Lunar and Planetary Institute is more optimistic.

He believes the polar ice can be mined to support human life on the Moon and in space and to make rocket propellant (by splitting it into liquid hydrogen and oxygen).

He also believes that the Moon is a testing ground, a small nearby planet where we can learn the techniques of the strategies and operations we need to explore the Solar System.

Telescopes erected on the lunar surface will possess many advantages over both Earth-based and space-based instruments, he says.

"Even during the lunar day, brighter sky objects are visible through the reflected surface glare. The far side of the Moon is permanently shielded from the din of electromagnetic noise produced by our industrial civilisation," he said.

Dr Spudis does not think lunar dust is a problem, "Recent suggestions that lunar dust poses unsolvable problems and difficulties for telescopes on the Moon are incorrect; lunar dust does not "coat" surfaces if left undisturbed."

'Immense technical difficulty'

Professor John Lewis of Arizona University did not think lunar ice would be easy to mine, he told the US government.

"I regard this suggestion with deep scepticism because of the immense technical difficulty of mining steel-hard and highly abrasive permafrost under conditions of permanent darkness, at the bottom of steep and rugged craters, at temperatures so low that most metals in the mining equipment are as brittle as glass."

"Further, the location of the hydrogen-bearing deposits (almost certainly dominated by water ice) at the poles is the most remote from sensible locations for a lunar base of any place on the Moon.

"The lunar ice deposits are of great scientific interest for the stories they can tell about comet and asteroid bombardment of the lunar surface. Scientific investigation of these deposits need not, and arguably should not, involve human presence."

He said that the use of lunar-derived propellants to support expeditions to Mars makes no logistic sense.

"The Moon is not "between" Earth and Mars; it is a different destination, poorly suited to function as a support base for travel to Mars."

Good debate



link




link
View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Lunar base options divide experts - 09/04/2004 12:56:49 PM 221 Views
Prof John Lewis seems right, but what do I know. - 09/04/2004 01:00:37 PM 12 Views
I am against it - 09/04/2004 01:02:16 PM 24 Views
Do you mean - 09/04/2004 01:03:40 PM 23 Views
what I mean is...... - 09/04/2004 01:06:23 PM 20 Views
And what of all the economic incentives? - 09/04/2004 01:19:07 PM 23 Views
what incentives? - 09/04/2004 01:21:51 PM 22 Views
helium 3 isotope for one - 09/04/2004 01:49:15 PM 28 Views
- 09/04/2004 11:03:00 PM 23 Views
Youre acting like a total moron. Stop your assinine behaviour. - 10/04/2004 01:01:51 AM 16 Views
wow - 10/04/2004 10:23:22 AM 15 Views
You are my friend and you always will be - 10/04/2004 01:33:43 PM 15 Views
well well well - 10/04/2004 08:31:35 PM 13 Views
Adrian was - 10/04/2004 08:53:23 PM 16 Views
hang on - 11/04/2004 02:56:20 AM 15 Views
Oh dear me. You still havent learned your lesson. - 11/04/2004 12:29:45 PM 16 Views
whatever - 12/04/2004 05:24:55 AM 16 Views
LOL - 12/04/2004 03:41:54 PM 15 Views
my my - 12/04/2004 09:01:47 PM 15 Views
My words shall be last no matter how hard you try. Give up - 13/04/2004 10:23:35 PM 16 Views
you can have it after this - 14/04/2004 08:42:47 AM 17 Views
word - 14/04/2004 06:02:17 PM 14 Views
You want another link? Read Luke Spamwalker's link - 10/04/2004 01:03:01 AM 13 Views
I could fire back some more at you... - 10/04/2004 10:26:12 AM 15 Views
Thats because you cant - 10/04/2004 01:34:39 PM 17 Views
well.......... - 10/04/2004 07:56:51 PM 12 Views
le sigh - 10/04/2004 08:03:06 PM 15 Views
sigh all you like - 10/04/2004 08:28:07 PM 16 Views
Well as long as john wants to leave. - 10/04/2004 08:54:25 PM 18 Views
wonderful - 11/04/2004 02:57:04 AM 15 Views
You want rudeness? - 11/04/2004 12:31:18 PM 21 Views
why would you reply that way to someone you consider a friend? - 10/04/2004 02:21:51 AM 15 Views
this is typical of you - 10/04/2004 10:24:23 AM 17 Views
Oh please. He takes your side all the time. - 10/04/2004 01:37:44 PM 23 Views
well, i'm for a lunar base - 09/04/2004 01:04:17 PM 18 Views
Agreed. - 09/04/2004 01:12:17 PM 21 Views
I also concur with your thoughts. - 09/04/2004 01:16:33 PM 21 Views
Yep, - 09/04/2004 01:34:01 PM 17 Views
I like the idea off more lunar landings - 09/04/2004 01:17:48 PM 20 Views
All Yuor Lunar Base Belong to Us - 09/04/2004 03:11:04 PM 19 Views
Go check out my last reply to wads - 09/04/2004 04:12:11 PM 17 Views
Fine. - 09/04/2004 04:29:25 PM 15 Views
I understand - 09/04/2004 05:05:26 PM 16 Views
~smiles~ - 09/04/2004 05:33:35 PM 17 Views
China - 09/04/2004 07:13:15 PM 16 Views
Personally... - 09/04/2004 06:16:41 PM 17 Views
Thanks I like that link - 09/04/2004 08:12:13 PM 14 Views
You're welcome... - 09/04/2004 10:59:45 PM 10 Views
What if it goes bust? - 10/04/2004 10:38:42 AM 17 Views
What if we just... - 13/04/2004 01:25:18 AM 14 Views