You're aware that living trees convert CO2 into oxygen, right?
They store the carbon. That is their envornmental function. They are carbon repositories. When they die, and rot, carbon is re-released. This does not happen with books.
And when they are chopped down, new trees are planted (and they continue the whole photosynthesis thing) in their stead, because the paper companies need trees.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
e-Readers
- 08/10/2010 12:12:55 PM
1179 Views
even a large collection of books does not use enough wood to be an issue
- 08/10/2010 04:23:10 PM
906 Views
I suppose there is some green benefits...
- 08/10/2010 06:19:34 PM
849 Views
One question: (for any Kindle user)
- 08/10/2010 10:19:08 PM
955 Views
Ick
- 08/10/2010 07:55:17 PM
890 Views
Camilla, you're a great lady, but you're almost a walking parody sometimes.
- 08/10/2010 11:07:04 PM
1051 Views
Honestly, I couldn't have given a rat's ass about its environmental impact.
- 08/10/2010 11:06:06 PM
1011 Views
Your statement about forests shows you don't know about modern forestry
- 09/10/2010 02:06:07 PM
875 Views
Re: Your statement about forests shows you don't know about modern forestry
- 09/10/2010 04:43:28 PM
832 Views
I'm not going to make the obvious comments in response to the phrase "native bush".
- 10/10/2010 05:40:26 AM
798 Views
I'm planning to buy an Ipad in a month or two
- 09/10/2010 03:13:48 PM
823 Views
You can't read on an iPad any more than you can read on a laptop. *NM*
- 09/10/2010 09:19:22 PM
374 Views
Oh, I can only read 3-4 hours at a time, then?
- 10/10/2010 06:33:28 AM
856 Views


*NM*