Active Users:502 Time:08/11/2026 01:57:03 PM
Re: hm. Camilla Send a noteboard - 18/10/2010 11:46:23 AM
I am intending to post something on Turgenev's women in this book, but for now let me say this: Katya follows the trend that "natural" women who stick to feelings rather than opinion and intellect are the more admirable mate. It bugs me. She has no personality of her own, apart from having hidden and being afraid of her more outspoken and organised sister (who has faults of her own, but still) -- Katya is a natural being who needs a man to find her, and I find I am getting slightly nauseated.

That will be fun to read. And my point was not that she's only important once found, but that Turgenev allows her to be something other than what Bazarov complains about, and other than the beautiful and intelligent Anna. She's a regular girl, which means she doesn't have to be something special. But it turns out that she could be, if anyone took the time to find out. I thought that was interesting, for what we've seen of Russian literature so far.

I didn't get that Turgenev had such a low opinion of women. In fact, Bazarov's low opinion of women seemed to be one of the obnoxiously false original stances he took. Then Turgenev introduced us to other options.

I don't know, my impression is simply different, I suppose. He does mention that Arkady and she share an interest in frivolities, so you could be right- I just put that down to the fact that she was young, and as yet undamaged by life (unlike Anna). Especially if you look back - when we meet her, one of the first comments is about how young and "green" she is. In my opinion, that doesn't mean she's worthless, or waiting to be shaped by a man. It just means she's young, and has been overshadowed by her powerful sister. In fact, Bazarov's comment that she will be something, and will take Arkady in hand underlined that for me (he says she's not falsely clever). She is the unruined Anna (and I don't mean to be so harsh on Anna, but she's obviously learned things during her years/marriage/etc).


You are probably right. I may be worked up over nothing here. It is just that I started getting annoyed when seeing Kukshina, because as she is clearly an idiot, her positions are tainted, and one of those is on the potential of women. And then it just kept turning out that all the men were choosing the most natural women they could find, intelligence being somewhat too much -- except for Bazarov, which I suppose is a redeeming point (for both him and Turgenev's women).
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Russian Book Club: Fathers and Sons by Turgenev. - 17/10/2010 01:39:16 AM 1160 Views
Bazarov - 17/10/2010 02:12:03 PM 985 Views
never mind *NM* - 17/10/2010 02:15:16 PM 411 Views
The novel is very interested in inter-generational issues. - 17/10/2010 05:28:29 PM 883 Views
Re: The novel is very interested in inter-generational issues. - 17/10/2010 11:59:37 PM 975 Views
oh, and - 17/10/2010 06:42:38 PM 862 Views
Re: oh, and - 18/10/2010 12:09:10 AM 848 Views
I like the way you said that - 19/10/2010 05:31:05 AM 886 Views
Re: I like the way you said that - 19/10/2010 09:24:00 AM 833 Views
I had pretty much the same reaction as you. - 22/10/2010 07:05:37 PM 900 Views
Arkady - 17/10/2010 02:15:54 PM 813 Views
Well, that makes sense - 17/10/2010 05:12:09 PM 820 Views
Re: Well, that makes sense - 18/10/2010 12:04:05 AM 831 Views
According to a footnote in my (Dutch) copy... - 18/10/2010 10:55:22 PM 849 Views
Ясень and ясный - 18/10/2010 11:41:24 PM 835 Views
See, I liked Arkady - 17/10/2010 06:08:57 PM 763 Views
Re: See, I liked Arkady - 18/10/2010 12:13:49 AM 811 Views
hm. - 18/10/2010 01:06:44 AM 912 Views
Re: hm. - 18/10/2010 11:46:23 AM 1068 Views
Re: hm. - 19/10/2010 05:38:02 AM 854 Views
Re: See, I liked Arkady - 18/10/2010 10:51:59 PM 825 Views
Re: Arkady - 22/10/2010 07:09:14 PM 886 Views
Oh...Rebekah, I was going to mention that I saw your post only much later because I was very drunk. - 17/10/2010 05:13:41 PM 846 Views
Heh, no worries. - 18/10/2010 11:07:00 AM 782 Views
Good book. - 17/10/2010 06:37:16 PM 881 Views
Agreed. - 18/10/2010 11:55:11 AM 971 Views
Re: Agreed. - 19/10/2010 06:02:18 AM 872 Views
Re: Agreed. - 19/10/2010 09:26:25 AM 779 Views
I didn't think Odintsova trapped him. - 18/10/2010 11:03:37 PM 838 Views
Re: I didn't think Odintsova trapped him. - 18/10/2010 11:31:40 PM 916 Views
Re: I didn't think Odintsova trapped him. - 19/10/2010 05:13:26 AM 859 Views
I think you might be overanalyzing the birch tree statement. - 18/10/2010 11:45:12 PM 832 Views
I disagree - 19/10/2010 05:27:07 AM 881 Views
I loved it. Great book. - 18/10/2010 10:49:27 PM 804 Views
Re: I loved it. Great book. - 18/10/2010 11:33:42 PM 781 Views
I think it's very relevant. It's also unusually un-Russian. - 18/10/2010 11:54:03 PM 772 Views
Yeah... the Russian nobility at the time seems to have been kind of un-Russian, really. - 20/10/2010 04:03:34 PM 860 Views
It felt very Russian to me as well - 20/10/2010 04:12:50 PM 771 Views
I really wish I'd bought a properly annotated version. - 22/10/2010 07:07:16 PM 868 Views
The answer to that is to just read a great book on Nineteenth Century Russian history. - 22/10/2010 10:55:06 PM 858 Views
Can you recommend one? - 22/10/2010 10:55:56 PM 1123 Views
"One" is where it starts to get harder. - 23/10/2010 01:45:03 AM 863 Views
Nikolai and Pavel - I love them. - 22/10/2010 07:14:11 PM 956 Views
Perhaps it's Pavel's "The Chap"-ish nature that makes the novel seem less Russian to me. - 22/10/2010 10:53:56 PM 925 Views
Ah, that's a good point. - 22/10/2010 10:54:56 PM 792 Views
The women - 22/10/2010 07:18:45 PM 886 Views

Reply to Message