Active Users:567 Time:16/03/2026 07:50:47 PM
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. Legolas Send a noteboard - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM
There's no reason for Doran not to offer Arianne to Aegon. After all, the initial plan was for Arianne to marry Viserys. Doran should have no objection to the Dany-Quentyn match happening later as a consolidation of the Targ-Martell alliance that he can quickly set up this way.

The Martells are not. Arianne and Aegon are full cousins, Doran might balk at that alright.
Reply to message
Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:34:59 AM 1419 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:28:33 PM 963 Views
I thought Tarly was in the Griff's pocket... - 16/07/2011 04:58:58 PM 956 Views
I don't think so. - 16/07/2011 07:40:53 PM 930 Views
Those are barely reasons... - 17/07/2011 03:08:23 AM 952 Views
Will the Martells refuse Elia's son for a stranger who may or may not marry Quentyn? - 17/07/2011 02:32:00 AM 1487 Views
I think it depends... - 17/07/2011 03:02:48 AM 899 Views
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM 869 Views
I don't think that will matter... - 18/07/2011 05:18:17 AM 899 Views
King's Landing has a hostage though. - 18/07/2011 12:16:21 AM 800 Views
She seems like a very feeble hostage though... - 18/07/2011 02:27:15 AM 861 Views
very interesting - 17/07/2011 12:16:10 AM 1246 Views
Sandor's dead? - 17/07/2011 02:24:23 AM 865 Views
A bit of confusion... - 17/07/2011 08:53:54 AM 858 Views
Re: A bit of confusion... - 18/07/2011 12:20:12 AM 809 Views
Ah, okay. Thanks for clearing that up! *NM* - 18/07/2011 02:21:14 AM 408 Views
If we're going there then we might as well throw Rhaegar in the mix... - 17/07/2011 05:49:37 PM 837 Views
Re: Sandor's dead? - 19/07/2011 08:50:13 PM 975 Views
Re: very interesting - 17/07/2011 03:01:06 AM 1134 Views
Re: very interesting - 19/07/2011 09:24:49 PM 1266 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 17/07/2011 04:07:30 AM 1044 Views

Reply to Message