Active Users:450 Time:13/12/2025 03:28:26 PM
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. Legolas Send a noteboard - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM
There's no reason for Doran not to offer Arianne to Aegon. After all, the initial plan was for Arianne to marry Viserys. Doran should have no objection to the Dany-Quentyn match happening later as a consolidation of the Targ-Martell alliance that he can quickly set up this way.

The Martells are not. Arianne and Aegon are full cousins, Doran might balk at that alright.
Reply to message
Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:34:59 AM 1381 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:28:33 PM 916 Views
I thought Tarly was in the Griff's pocket... - 16/07/2011 04:58:58 PM 914 Views
I don't think so. - 16/07/2011 07:40:53 PM 889 Views
Those are barely reasons... - 17/07/2011 03:08:23 AM 912 Views
Will the Martells refuse Elia's son for a stranger who may or may not marry Quentyn? - 17/07/2011 02:32:00 AM 1448 Views
I think it depends... - 17/07/2011 03:02:48 AM 867 Views
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM 834 Views
I don't think that will matter... - 18/07/2011 05:18:17 AM 863 Views
King's Landing has a hostage though. - 18/07/2011 12:16:21 AM 763 Views
She seems like a very feeble hostage though... - 18/07/2011 02:27:15 AM 829 Views
very interesting - 17/07/2011 12:16:10 AM 1205 Views
Sandor's dead? - 17/07/2011 02:24:23 AM 830 Views
A bit of confusion... - 17/07/2011 08:53:54 AM 828 Views
Re: A bit of confusion... - 18/07/2011 12:20:12 AM 783 Views
Ah, okay. Thanks for clearing that up! *NM* - 18/07/2011 02:21:14 AM 393 Views
If we're going there then we might as well throw Rhaegar in the mix... - 17/07/2011 05:49:37 PM 802 Views
Re: Sandor's dead? - 19/07/2011 08:50:13 PM 935 Views
Re: very interesting - 17/07/2011 03:01:06 AM 1103 Views
Re: very interesting - 19/07/2011 09:24:49 PM 1225 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 17/07/2011 04:07:30 AM 1003 Views

Reply to Message