Active Users:2332 Time:18/06/2026 12:39:27 AM
You can't dismiss his impact, even if you do not like his storytelling. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 23/01/2012 07:40:19 PM
You will not find anywhere in my post where I defended his writing style. I warn people, before they start LOTR, that his books are not an "easy read".

However, his work fired the imaginations of many authors and sent them off into a new direction of story telling and world building. Many of them, wrote/write much better than he did. However, his work is the one you put your finger on and say "this" is high fantasy. He is the standard that now other's creations are held up against.

The original post even talks about divorcing your critique of his writing from the impact it had. I simply find this specific non-unique situation to be an excellent illustration of why I dismiss writing critics, critiques, and reviews by so-called "experts." Especially the ones that, in their arrogance, sneer down their noses at hugely popular works BECAUSE they are popular. Unable to acknowledge that it is exactly those pupular stories, read by million, that are going to ignite the imaginations of tomorrow's authors.



Reply to message
1961 Nobel Finalists: J.R.R. Tolkien - 19/01/2012 09:27:46 AM 1235 Views
It's difficult to assess Tolkien's relative merits then 51 years later. - 19/01/2012 02:41:52 PM 845 Views
Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 02:58:00 PM 816 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:34:02 PM 695 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:45:07 PM 805 Views
Yet Jung personally was contemptuous of Joyce - 19/01/2012 06:41:58 PM 670 Views
Tolkein is an excellent example why I usually dismiss literary critics/critiques - 23/01/2012 05:57:51 PM 931 Views
There's a lot more to it than that. - 23/01/2012 07:20:30 PM 781 Views
True - 23/01/2012 07:57:42 PM 774 Views
You can't dismiss his impact, even if you do not like his storytelling. - 23/01/2012 07:40:19 PM 821 Views
Who is dismissing that he influenced millions well after 1961? - 23/01/2012 07:54:27 PM 779 Views
That's an odd argument - 23/01/2012 07:51:49 PM 861 Views
Not really - 23/01/2012 10:35:39 PM 691 Views
Eh... - 24/01/2012 12:40:37 AM 715 Views
Depends on what you see as the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 08:14:07 AM 675 Views
the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 01:30:28 PM 800 Views
NO - 24/01/2012 02:05:11 PM 659 Views
Re: NO - 25/01/2012 02:54:57 PM 655 Views

Reply to Message