there might not be weight, but MASS still plays a role
imlad Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 05:21:08 PM
And honestly - when you build a spacecraft, the fact that ice is cheaper is not a major factor. Weight factors in too, I believe. You'd need a good thick coat of ice to make it useful, and then propulsion would be a problem. You'd have to calculate the trade-off.
I really don't think weight would be much of a factor when you're talking about a SPACE ship. The whole idea is that you are in space, where if you have forgotten, you are WEIGHTLESS.....
You still have to move all that mass, which effects your thrust.
I do remember in one of the books Shepherd talks about the ships being in the 200,000-350,000 ton range.
And the coating of ice on the big ships was about 5 meters. That is a lot of ice.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
anyone seen ice used as shielding for ships in SF
- 19/10/2009 04:35:45 PM
3497 Views
I think this is in THE SONGS OF DISTANT EARTH by Arthur C. Clarke
- 19/10/2009 05:20:24 PM
450 Views
It does sound like the kind of brilliant-yet-obvious idea Clarke would have.
- 19/10/2009 05:31:23 PM
439 Views
*NM*
Found the story. There is an ice-shield, but it's for space dust, not lasers. *NM*
- 19/10/2009 11:47:33 PM
172 Views
Ice shielding against lasers?
- 19/10/2009 07:28:51 PM
1811 Views
It wouldn't reflect, but it would significantly diffract... *NM*
- 19/10/2009 09:25:16 PM
189 Views
Perhaps...
- 20/10/2009 08:31:08 AM
410 Views
in Shepherd's novels they do burn thru the ice quickly, thus the ships spin *NM*
- 20/10/2009 05:18:53 PM
173 Views
Re: Ice shielding against lasers?
- 20/10/2009 03:39:25 AM
2099 Views
there might not be weight, but MASS still plays a role
- 20/10/2009 05:21:08 PM
429 Views