Active Users:236 Time:20/04/2024 10:21:04 AM
Really? Jeordam Send a noteboard - 07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM
The reason why the first books seem simplistic and the last books so dense is because JKR intentionally wrote it for the development of her audience. In the first book, a young child really wouldn't understand what's so bad about living under the stairs, it probably seems like oodles of fun to them. Looking back, as you did, they would realize the importance of what Harry endured. But as the audience gets older, JKR's writing becomes more advanced, as it should. I don't know about you, but I definitely would have stopped reading if the difficulty remained at an elementary level. To me, its not simplistic but brilliant, as Harry would say.


I didn't see it so much as gearing it for her target reader, as that was her writing style at the time. Like anyone, they get better at their job as they get more experience. I was seeing the whole thing as a literary example of the author's progression as a writter. But I would have probably tuned out and left the series if it stayed that simple. As it was, the first few books were such easy reads, that I would fly through them. And I am certainly not a fast reader.

~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Harry Potter (the entire series) - 06/04/2010 11:00:07 PM 1629 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series) - 06/04/2010 11:29:49 PM 922 Views
Really? - 07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM 959 Views
I honestly think it's a combination of the two - 07/04/2010 05:55:18 PM 847 Views
I'll give you that.... - 07/04/2010 06:11:27 PM 864 Views
Yeah, I believe she's explicitly said she did that on purpose - 10/04/2010 08:24:47 PM 790 Views
Um...you forgot a book. - 06/04/2010 11:37:27 PM 884 Views
My bad...much thanks for reminding me. - 07/04/2010 05:43:53 PM 859 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series) - 07/04/2010 12:26:22 AM 1145 Views
I get where you're coming from - 07/04/2010 06:19:13 PM 959 Views
That's kind of the point though... - 07/04/2010 08:44:26 PM 915 Views
This is how I see it too - 08/04/2010 12:43:03 AM 1026 Views
just a comment about your rich=bad - 08/04/2010 02:05:32 AM 983 Views
Re: just a comment about your rich=bad - 08/04/2010 05:58:13 PM 994 Views
it was a bit black and white... - 08/04/2010 08:48:05 PM 787 Views
I agree with many of your points. - 07/04/2010 12:44:31 AM 1073 Views
I have to dispute the concept of going "too far." - 07/04/2010 06:32:47 AM 827 Views
Hm, I don't know. - 07/04/2010 11:08:12 AM 912 Views
I agree entirely about Snape *NM* - 07/04/2010 11:50:00 AM 399 Views
More conversation on Snape. - 07/04/2010 06:01:37 PM 1124 Views
Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue. - 07/04/2010 07:13:55 AM 1168 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue. - 07/04/2010 06:09:20 PM 1020 Views
The movies are even worse about this. - 07/04/2010 06:15:35 PM 899 Views
Hmmm.... - 07/04/2010 06:21:40 PM 887 Views
Oh, that's definitely why they did it - 09/04/2010 06:44:50 AM 1213 Views
how many high school relationships... - 08/04/2010 02:13:48 AM 876 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue. - 08/04/2010 03:25:38 PM 1001 Views
Harry Potter and Star Wars have two radically different approaches to this - 07/04/2010 06:13:25 PM 1076 Views
When my son asked for his own set of Harry Potter books, - 07/04/2010 10:26:37 PM 920 Views
This is assuming of course... - 07/04/2010 11:00:15 PM 970 Views
yes, that's where parenting gets "complicated" - 08/04/2010 02:16:06 AM 892 Views
You are taking this a bit extreme I feel. - 08/04/2010 08:51:34 AM 838 Views
I agree. *NM* - 08/04/2010 06:11:06 PM 348 Views
Re: This is assuming of course... - 08/04/2010 03:30:33 PM 1018 Views
I am the same way with a few books. - 08/04/2010 08:05:04 PM 862 Views
I was most irritated by the ironic names - 08/04/2010 05:38:59 AM 1005 Views
Re: I was most irritated by the ironic names - 08/04/2010 10:07:40 PM 1285 Views

Reply to Message