The reason why the first books seem simplistic and the last books so dense is because JKR intentionally wrote it for the development of her audience. In the first book, a young child really wouldn't understand what's so bad about living under the stairs, it probably seems like oodles of fun to them. Looking back, as you did, they would realize the importance of what Harry endured. But as the audience gets older, JKR's writing becomes more advanced, as it should. I don't know about you, but I definitely would have stopped reading if the difficulty remained at an elementary level. To me, its not simplistic but brilliant, as Harry would say.
I didn't see it so much as gearing it for her target reader, as that was her writing style at the time. Like anyone, they get better at their job as they get more experience. I was seeing the whole thing as a literary example of the author's progression as a writter. But I would have probably tuned out and left the series if it stayed that simple. As it was, the first few books were such easy reads, that I would fly through them. And I am certainly not a fast reader.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Harry Potter (the entire series)
- 06/04/2010 11:00:07 PM
1926 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series)
- 06/04/2010 11:29:49 PM
1200 Views
Really?
- 07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM
1258 Views
I honestly think it's a combination of the two
- 07/04/2010 05:55:18 PM
1126 Views
I'll give you that....
- 07/04/2010 06:11:27 PM
1168 Views
It does seem logical that the series gets more teenager-oriented as Harry grows older.
- 07/04/2010 06:47:57 PM
1151 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series)
- 07/04/2010 12:26:22 AM
1484 Views
I get where you're coming from
- 07/04/2010 06:19:13 PM
1267 Views
That's kind of the point though...
- 07/04/2010 08:44:26 PM
1192 Views
This is how I see it too
- 08/04/2010 12:43:03 AM
1327 Views
just a comment about your rich=bad
- 08/04/2010 02:05:32 AM
1273 Views
I agree with many of your points.
- 07/04/2010 12:44:31 AM
1386 Views
I have to dispute the concept of going "too far."
- 07/04/2010 06:32:47 AM
1140 Views
Hm, I don't know.
- 07/04/2010 11:08:12 AM
1194 Views
This is a lot like the argument I'm having with Joel on the CMB concerning original sin.
- 08/04/2010 07:21:39 AM
1107 Views
- 08/04/2010 07:21:39 AM
1107 Views
Where is this debate? I'd like to read it.
- 08/04/2010 05:18:38 PM
1774 Views
I should have put "debate" in quotes. It's about four sentences long.
- 08/04/2010 10:32:43 PM
1088 Views
- 08/04/2010 10:32:43 PM
1088 Views
More conversation on Snape.
- 07/04/2010 06:01:37 PM
1439 Views
His death wasn't very spectacular, but he did play an essential role...
- 07/04/2010 06:45:58 PM
1295 Views
Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue.
- 07/04/2010 07:13:55 AM
1486 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue.
- 07/04/2010 06:09:20 PM
1315 Views
The movies are even worse about this.
- 07/04/2010 06:15:35 PM
1189 Views
Death doesn't actually happen in slow-motion fit for the cinema screen.
- 08/04/2010 07:24:31 AM
1146 Views
Re: Death doesn't actually happen in slow-motion fit for the cinema screen.
- 08/04/2010 03:27:09 PM
1171 Views
Harry Potter and Star Wars have two radically different approaches to this
- 07/04/2010 06:13:25 PM
1399 Views
When my son asked for his own set of Harry Potter books,
- 07/04/2010 10:26:37 PM
1223 Views
This is assuming of course...
- 07/04/2010 11:00:15 PM
1264 Views
I was most irritated by the ironic names
- 08/04/2010 05:38:59 AM
1277 Views
Re: I was most irritated by the ironic names
- 08/04/2010 10:07:40 PM
1713 Views
Exactly - it's not as obvious if you're a kid, then it seems clever and it's fun to decode.
- 09/04/2010 01:04:11 AM
1241 Views
