Interesting but flawed reasoning. I have read all of the Dune books, including the ones that were written/completed by his son. Apparently I ahve also read the ones you have much more ofter. Arakis is one of the major characters of the first book (in later books you discover that the planet was not the character instead it is the worms), but ecology and enrinmental activism is not one of the major themes. It is at best a side effect. The major themes of Dune are all religious, moral, and mercantile.
Additionally, there is no commentary about homosexuallity in the novel. BH is simply, intentionally, displayed as possessing the most offensive and disgusting traits imaginable. You would be just as accurate to attempt to fabricate some sort of parrallel between obese people and sexual deviancy in the novel.
You are making the error that entirely too many reviewers have and will do. Attempting to find themes in prose that do not exist because the author did not write them. Too many reviewer tripple-think into wonderful themes and messages by grabbing various images and actions and weaving them into a coherant "message" that simply does not exist, because the author was not writing them.
There is no emviromental activism as we know it today in the novels, there is only an effort to convert a natural desert into airiable land. There is no statement on homosexuallity, there is simply an incredibly evil sadistic individual who partakes in every manner of diviant behavior imaginable, becasue he can.
If you want to investigate the thems, investigate the ones the authro wrote about: Slavery, Religion, Orthodoxy (morallity, i.e "The Greater Good"
, Polotics (money=power, rule by fear vs loyalty). There is plenty to discuss, without creating new themes form whole cloth to further ones oown adgendas and biases. Alas, entirely too many reviewers and critics desire this, instead of investigating and discussing wghat teh auther actually intends.
Though intelectually flawed, your piece is well written and supported by the passages you selected, kudos.
Additionally, there is no commentary about homosexuallity in the novel. BH is simply, intentionally, displayed as possessing the most offensive and disgusting traits imaginable. You would be just as accurate to attempt to fabricate some sort of parrallel between obese people and sexual deviancy in the novel.
You are making the error that entirely too many reviewers have and will do. Attempting to find themes in prose that do not exist because the author did not write them. Too many reviewer tripple-think into wonderful themes and messages by grabbing various images and actions and weaving them into a coherant "message" that simply does not exist, because the author was not writing them.
There is no emviromental activism as we know it today in the novels, there is only an effort to convert a natural desert into airiable land. There is no statement on homosexuallity, there is simply an incredibly evil sadistic individual who partakes in every manner of diviant behavior imaginable, becasue he can.
If you want to investigate the thems, investigate the ones the authro wrote about: Slavery, Religion, Orthodoxy (morallity, i.e "The Greater Good"
, Polotics (money=power, rule by fear vs loyalty). There is plenty to discuss, without creating new themes form whole cloth to further ones oown adgendas and biases. Alas, entirely too many reviewers and critics desire this, instead of investigating and discussing wghat teh auther actually intends. Though intelectually flawed, your piece is well written and supported by the passages you selected, kudos.
Frank Herbert, Dune Chronicles (series reviews within)
- 16/04/2010 04:11:40 AM
2064 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 16/04/2010 06:09:49 PM
1166 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 17/04/2010 12:08:06 AM
1367 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 17/04/2010 02:33:38 PM
1291 Views
Not all themes are intended by the author. That doesn't mean they aren't there.
- 17/04/2010 06:54:14 PM
1339 Views
Re: Not all themes are intended by the author. That doesn't mean they aren't there.
- 17/04/2010 10:44:18 PM
1182 Views
I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological"
- 18/04/2010 12:13:14 AM
1290 Views
Re: I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological"
- 18/04/2010 03:34:33 AM
1344 Views
Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white?
- 18/04/2010 05:18:07 AM
1146 Views
Re: Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white?
- 19/04/2010 06:15:26 PM
1206 Views
That was most of my issue.
- 21/04/2010 12:12:56 AM
1065 Views
Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme
- 21/04/2010 02:09:42 PM
1152 Views
Thank you for saying concisely the point I have been trying to make. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 06:34:12 PM
490 Views
A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present
- 21/04/2010 11:21:38 PM
1082 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present
- 22/04/2010 04:58:01 AM
1054 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present
- 22/04/2010 04:08:28 PM
997 Views
Texts have different interpretations and Readers emphasize different aspects
- 22/04/2010 09:28:05 PM
1118 Views
Re: Texts have different interpretations and Readers emphasize different aspects
- 23/04/2010 05:22:22 PM
1030 Views
Re: Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme
- 29/04/2010 11:36:45 PM
1136 Views
Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic.
- 19/04/2010 07:52:27 PM
1167 Views
Re: Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic.
- 20/04/2010 07:04:40 PM
1040 Views
Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all.
- 21/04/2010 01:46:50 AM
939 Views
Re: Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all.
- 21/04/2010 06:23:24 PM
1178 Views
People who see this as an ecological book are missing the point of the book
- 16/04/2010 06:28:40 PM
1553 Views
Books can have more than one theme. Great books almost always do. *NM*
- 16/04/2010 07:15:11 PM
517 Views
I agree with that I just never really the ecological theme to Dune
- 16/04/2010 10:12:26 PM
1234 Views
There are several points to the book/series
- 17/04/2010 12:11:38 AM
1266 Views
Everyone get something different from a book
- 19/04/2010 07:01:51 PM
1440 Views
I believe those themes become more pronounced later in the series
- 20/04/2010 10:09:36 PM
1192 Views
I remember having hated every single character of this book. Some random thoughts
- 17/04/2010 05:08:25 PM
1367 Views
Well, I enjoyed more of the characters this time around, if that helps
- 18/04/2010 12:14:43 AM
1255 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 17/04/2010 08:05:16 PM
1649 Views
I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM
1451 Views
- 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM
1451 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM
1407 Views
- 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM
1407 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM
1311 Views
- 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM
1311 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM
1073 Views
- 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM
1073 Views
I thought all of Dune had begun as a serial in a SF magazine. *NM*
- 22/04/2010 01:58:22 PM
463 Views
Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 19/04/2010 08:42:18 AM
1424 Views
Re: Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 21/04/2010 03:33:46 PM
1057 Views
I didn't see that in Alia
- 21/04/2010 11:27:22 PM
988 Views
There were a few scenes displaying Alia's abilities/mindset. (spoilers)
- 22/04/2010 03:54:32 PM
982 Views
OK, that makes a bit more sense, as I wasn't for sure what you were arguing at first
- 22/04/2010 09:14:46 PM
1094 Views
One of my favorite series!
- 21/04/2010 03:30:57 PM
985 Views
I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it
- 21/04/2010 11:29:50 PM
905 Views
Re: I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it
- 22/04/2010 04:02:26 PM
1019 Views
Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 28/04/2010 06:02:54 AM
955 Views
Re: Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 29/04/2010 03:26:28 PM
1038 Views
