Interesting but flawed reasoning. I have read all of the Dune books, including the ones that were written/completed by his son. Apparently I ahve also read the ones you have much more ofter. Arakis is one of the major characters of the first book (in later books you discover that the planet was not the character instead it is the worms), but ecology and enrinmental activism is not one of the major themes. It is at best a side effect. The major themes of Dune are all religious, moral, and mercantile.
Additionally, there is no commentary about homosexuallity in the novel. BH is simply, intentionally, displayed as possessing the most offensive and disgusting traits imaginable. You would be just as accurate to attempt to fabricate some sort of parrallel between obese people and sexual deviancy in the novel.
You are making the error that entirely too many reviewers have and will do. Attempting to find themes in prose that do not exist because the author did not write them. Too many reviewer tripple-think into wonderful themes and messages by grabbing various images and actions and weaving them into a coherant "message" that simply does not exist, because the author was not writing them.
There is no emviromental activism as we know it today in the novels, there is only an effort to convert a natural desert into airiable land. There is no statement on homosexuallity, there is simply an incredibly evil sadistic individual who partakes in every manner of diviant behavior imaginable, becasue he can.
If you want to investigate the thems, investigate the ones the authro wrote about: Slavery, Religion, Orthodoxy (morallity, i.e "The Greater Good"
, Polotics (money=power, rule by fear vs loyalty). There is plenty to discuss, without creating new themes form whole cloth to further ones oown adgendas and biases. Alas, entirely too many reviewers and critics desire this, instead of investigating and discussing wghat teh auther actually intends.
Though intelectually flawed, your piece is well written and supported by the passages you selected, kudos.
Additionally, there is no commentary about homosexuallity in the novel. BH is simply, intentionally, displayed as possessing the most offensive and disgusting traits imaginable. You would be just as accurate to attempt to fabricate some sort of parrallel between obese people and sexual deviancy in the novel.
You are making the error that entirely too many reviewers have and will do. Attempting to find themes in prose that do not exist because the author did not write them. Too many reviewer tripple-think into wonderful themes and messages by grabbing various images and actions and weaving them into a coherant "message" that simply does not exist, because the author was not writing them.
There is no emviromental activism as we know it today in the novels, there is only an effort to convert a natural desert into airiable land. There is no statement on homosexuallity, there is simply an incredibly evil sadistic individual who partakes in every manner of diviant behavior imaginable, becasue he can.
If you want to investigate the thems, investigate the ones the authro wrote about: Slavery, Religion, Orthodoxy (morallity, i.e "The Greater Good"
, Polotics (money=power, rule by fear vs loyalty). There is plenty to discuss, without creating new themes form whole cloth to further ones oown adgendas and biases. Alas, entirely too many reviewers and critics desire this, instead of investigating and discussing wghat teh auther actually intends. Though intelectually flawed, your piece is well written and supported by the passages you selected, kudos.
Frank Herbert, Dune Chronicles (series reviews within)
- 16/04/2010 04:11:40 AM
2036 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 16/04/2010 06:09:49 PM
1137 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 17/04/2010 12:08:06 AM
1337 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 17/04/2010 02:33:38 PM
1264 Views
Not all themes are intended by the author. That doesn't mean they aren't there.
- 17/04/2010 06:54:14 PM
1307 Views
Re: Not all themes are intended by the author. That doesn't mean they aren't there.
- 17/04/2010 10:44:18 PM
1142 Views
I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological"
- 18/04/2010 12:13:14 AM
1259 Views
Re: I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological"
- 18/04/2010 03:34:33 AM
1314 Views
Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white?
- 18/04/2010 05:18:07 AM
1113 Views
Re: Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white?
- 19/04/2010 06:15:26 PM
1175 Views
That was most of my issue.
- 21/04/2010 12:12:56 AM
1039 Views
Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme
- 21/04/2010 02:09:42 PM
1122 Views
Thank you for saying concisely the point I have been trying to make. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 06:34:12 PM
475 Views
A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present
- 21/04/2010 11:21:38 PM
1050 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present
- 22/04/2010 04:58:01 AM
1028 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present
- 22/04/2010 04:08:28 PM
968 Views
Texts have different interpretations and Readers emphasize different aspects
- 22/04/2010 09:28:05 PM
1093 Views
Re: Texts have different interpretations and Readers emphasize different aspects
- 23/04/2010 05:22:22 PM
1002 Views
Re: Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme
- 29/04/2010 11:36:45 PM
1101 Views
Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic.
- 19/04/2010 07:52:27 PM
1138 Views
Re: Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic.
- 20/04/2010 07:04:40 PM
1007 Views
Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all.
- 21/04/2010 01:46:50 AM
913 Views
Re: Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all.
- 21/04/2010 06:23:24 PM
1151 Views
People who see this as an ecological book are missing the point of the book
- 16/04/2010 06:28:40 PM
1525 Views
Books can have more than one theme. Great books almost always do. *NM*
- 16/04/2010 07:15:11 PM
502 Views
I agree with that I just never really the ecological theme to Dune
- 16/04/2010 10:12:26 PM
1202 Views
There are several points to the book/series
- 17/04/2010 12:11:38 AM
1236 Views
Everyone get something different from a book
- 19/04/2010 07:01:51 PM
1414 Views
I believe those themes become more pronounced later in the series
- 20/04/2010 10:09:36 PM
1166 Views
I remember having hated every single character of this book. Some random thoughts
- 17/04/2010 05:08:25 PM
1344 Views
Well, I enjoyed more of the characters this time around, if that helps
- 18/04/2010 12:14:43 AM
1229 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune
- 17/04/2010 08:05:16 PM
1623 Views
I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM
1427 Views
- 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM
1427 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM
1366 Views
- 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM
1366 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM
1283 Views
- 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM
1283 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom
- 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM
1045 Views
- 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM
1045 Views
I thought all of Dune had begun as a serial in a SF magazine. *NM*
- 22/04/2010 01:58:22 PM
449 Views
Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 19/04/2010 08:42:18 AM
1334 Views
Re: Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 21/04/2010 03:33:46 PM
1009 Views
I didn't see that in Alia
- 21/04/2010 11:27:22 PM
947 Views
There were a few scenes displaying Alia's abilities/mindset. (spoilers)
- 22/04/2010 03:54:32 PM
948 Views
OK, that makes a bit more sense, as I wasn't for sure what you were arguing at first
- 22/04/2010 09:14:46 PM
1063 Views
One of my favorite series!
- 21/04/2010 03:30:57 PM
954 Views
I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it
- 21/04/2010 11:29:50 PM
883 Views
Re: I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it
- 22/04/2010 04:02:26 PM
985 Views
Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 28/04/2010 06:02:54 AM
925 Views
Re: Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read)
- 29/04/2010 03:26:28 PM
1008 Views
