Suppose you have two independent clauses conjoined: "I like owlbears, and you like hobgoblins." The comma is necessary, of course.
But suppose the sentence were more like this: "Suppose I like owlbears(,) and you like hobgoblins."
Here I would say the subject is the implied "you", the verb "suppose", and the entire clause "I like owlbears and you like hobgoblins" is the object of the verb. Having said that, I do still think you need the comma between "owlbears" and "and", since they are still independent clauses, whatever function they are serving in the overall sentence.
Or this: "Suppose that I like owlbears(,) and you like hobgoblins."
Same as above only it reads slightly better, and I would actually have heard an implied "that" after suppose in the first sentence.
Or this: "Suppose that I like owlbears(,) and that you like hobgoblins."
This is the only place where I do not think you need a comma, since "that you like hobgoblins" is no longer an independent clause. Then "that I like owlbears" and "that you like hobgoblins" form a list of things that you should suppose, and you wouldn't separate the items in a list of 2 with commas. In other words, you wouldn't say, "I like the colors green, and blue."
Although I wonder if for the sake of parallelism that 2nd "that" is implied as well, meaning you shouldn't use a comma for any of the 3 examples?
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
I cast Summon Grammar Nazi.
- 23/04/2010 02:24:27 AM
1599 Views
I think the first 2 are OK either way, but the third is wrong (essential clause). *NM*
- 23/04/2010 03:44:10 AM
419 Views
I like owlbears and you, like hobgoblins.
- 23/04/2010 03:59:31 AM
530 Views
I imagine someone speaking in a Tonto voice, with the sentence structured like that. *NM*
- 06/05/2010 03:07:39 AM
413 Views
Actually, you don't need the comma in your first sentence.
- 23/04/2010 08:37:42 AM
472 Views
- 23/04/2010 08:37:42 AM
472 Views
Mmm, yes he does.
- 23/04/2010 03:38:06 PM
463 Views
Depends on the independent clauses.
- 23/04/2010 04:58:27 PM
463 Views
Not in American English, it doesn't.
- 23/04/2010 05:13:15 PM
501 Views
- 23/04/2010 05:13:15 PM
501 Views
I actually like the "that" but I'm not Bekah.
- 23/04/2010 03:01:37 PM
434 Views
Depending on the inflection used...
- 23/04/2010 03:26:26 PM
452 Views
Fair point; so is knowing to whom you speak.
- 23/04/2010 04:04:30 PM
431 Views
- 23/04/2010 04:04:30 PM
431 Views
except that is an improper use of a semicolon.
- 23/04/2010 04:24:00 PM
432 Views
If a comma is appropriate in the original supposition, then the semicolon is necessary here.
- 23/04/2010 11:24:20 PM
431 Views
but
- 24/04/2010 03:03:22 AM
421 Views
I believe it's treated like one. The comma takes the place of the verb. *NM*
- 24/04/2010 03:23:38 PM
401 Views
Re: Fair point; so is knowing to whom you speak.
- 23/04/2010 06:33:58 PM
457 Views
- 23/04/2010 06:33:58 PM
457 Views
Your pro-elf anti-hobgoblin prejudice has been obvious for some time, Marge.
- 28/04/2010 02:41:41 AM
424 Views
Hobgoblins killed my elf friend.
- 28/04/2010 01:40:22 PM
438 Views
Jesus built my hotrod.
- 04/05/2010 05:38:02 PM
458 Views
I think my friend was perfectly justified...
- 04/05/2010 06:40:05 PM
469 Views
So the truth comes out: Nothing more than interspecies homophobia.
- 04/05/2010 06:57:56 PM
476 Views
- 04/05/2010 06:57:56 PM
476 Views
Dude. You know sisters are off limits.
- 05/05/2010 01:22:49 PM
449 Views
So, what, they're supposed to die old maids?
- 06/05/2010 02:57:46 PM
438 Views
Of course not.
- 07/05/2010 02:07:36 PM
478 Views
Apologies for the delay.
- 18/10/2011 02:48:00 PM
387 Views
Necromancy is generally frowned upon.
- 18/10/2011 03:00:05 PM
493 Views
I was unaware of your response until yesterday, and wanted to acknowledge it.
- 18/10/2011 03:14:12 PM
375 Views
Dude, WTF! This thread is like a year and a half old
- 18/10/2011 08:58:14 PM
380 Views
No need for commas in either of the lats 3 examples. *NM*
- 23/04/2010 03:02:38 PM
430 Views
You have Latvian lats? It's a sort of worthless currency for trading purposes. *NM*
- 23/04/2010 04:46:07 PM
439 Views
Re: I cast Summon Grammar Nazi.
- 23/04/2010 03:45:31 PM
476 Views
I tap three mana and cast Cancel. *NM*
- 23/04/2010 05:26:17 PM
431 Views
It won't work, the only way to banish the Grammar Nazi is with Text Messages
- 23/04/2010 11:41:51 PM
459 Views
You get...300 exposition points, a scroll of open/close quotes, and a direct object. *NM*
- 24/04/2010 02:32:48 AM
435 Views
Apparently someone also cast Necromancy (Resurrect Deceased Thread). *NM*
- 18/10/2011 07:30:02 PM
375 Views


*NM*