It is perhaps a case of using a bad example, but that example doesn't need the comma because the two parts are closely related. It's just a short list of what two different people like.
When the independent clauses are not as closely related as that then the comma is (most often) necessary.
There are times when the use of a comma is a style choice and there isn't a right or wrong answer. I would argue that the example given is such a time.
The problem with the grammar and punctuation "rules" we are taught at school is that they are usually only half the story. It's easier to teach that it's "I before E except after C" than "I before E except after C in words that rhyme with "ee" because children will remember the shorter one more easily. The problem is that then people think there are more execptions than the "rule" and thus think that rules are pointless in English. I think a similar problem has happened with the guidelines surrounding the use of commas.
When the independent clauses are not as closely related as that then the comma is (most often) necessary.
There are times when the use of a comma is a style choice and there isn't a right or wrong answer. I would argue that the example given is such a time.
The problem with the grammar and punctuation "rules" we are taught at school is that they are usually only half the story. It's easier to teach that it's "I before E except after C" than "I before E except after C in words that rhyme with "ee" because children will remember the shorter one more easily. The problem is that then people think there are more execptions than the "rule" and thus think that rules are pointless in English. I think a similar problem has happened with the guidelines surrounding the use of commas.
Unless you want to argue that the two ideas aren't actually independent clauses, but I would disagree.
The use of "and" in the example sentence makes the comma necessary if the two clauses are both independent. Had he used a different joiner word (not a coordinating conjunction) instead, creating a dependent clause out of the 2nd one (such as in "I like owlbears although you like hobgoblins"), use of the comma would be incorrect.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
I cast Summon Grammar Nazi.
- 23/04/2010 02:24:27 AM
1503 Views
I think the first 2 are OK either way, but the third is wrong (essential clause). *NM*
- 23/04/2010 03:44:10 AM
375 Views
I like owlbears and you, like hobgoblins.
- 23/04/2010 03:59:31 AM
483 Views
I imagine someone speaking in a Tonto voice, with the sentence structured like that. *NM*
- 06/05/2010 03:07:39 AM
373 Views
Actually, you don't need the comma in your first sentence.
- 23/04/2010 08:37:42 AM
431 Views
- 23/04/2010 08:37:42 AM
431 Views
Mmm, yes he does.
- 23/04/2010 03:38:06 PM
420 Views
Depends on the independent clauses.
- 23/04/2010 04:58:27 PM
414 Views
Not in American English, it doesn't.
- 23/04/2010 05:13:15 PM
447 Views
- 23/04/2010 05:13:15 PM
447 Views
I actually like the "that" but I'm not Bekah.
- 23/04/2010 03:01:37 PM
388 Views
Depending on the inflection used...
- 23/04/2010 03:26:26 PM
402 Views
Fair point; so is knowing to whom you speak.
- 23/04/2010 04:04:30 PM
393 Views
- 23/04/2010 04:04:30 PM
393 Views
except that is an improper use of a semicolon.
- 23/04/2010 04:24:00 PM
389 Views
If a comma is appropriate in the original supposition, then the semicolon is necessary here.
- 23/04/2010 11:24:20 PM
387 Views
but
- 24/04/2010 03:03:22 AM
375 Views
I believe it's treated like one. The comma takes the place of the verb. *NM*
- 24/04/2010 03:23:38 PM
358 Views
Re: Fair point; so is knowing to whom you speak.
- 23/04/2010 06:33:58 PM
414 Views
- 23/04/2010 06:33:58 PM
414 Views
Your pro-elf anti-hobgoblin prejudice has been obvious for some time, Marge.
- 28/04/2010 02:41:41 AM
368 Views
Hobgoblins killed my elf friend.
- 28/04/2010 01:40:22 PM
386 Views
Jesus built my hotrod.
- 04/05/2010 05:38:02 PM
411 Views
I think my friend was perfectly justified...
- 04/05/2010 06:40:05 PM
426 Views
So the truth comes out: Nothing more than interspecies homophobia.
- 04/05/2010 06:57:56 PM
432 Views
- 04/05/2010 06:57:56 PM
432 Views
Dude. You know sisters are off limits.
- 05/05/2010 01:22:49 PM
409 Views
So, what, they're supposed to die old maids?
- 06/05/2010 02:57:46 PM
397 Views
Of course not.
- 07/05/2010 02:07:36 PM
435 Views
Apologies for the delay.
- 18/10/2011 02:48:00 PM
348 Views
Necromancy is generally frowned upon.
- 18/10/2011 03:00:05 PM
435 Views
I was unaware of your response until yesterday, and wanted to acknowledge it.
- 18/10/2011 03:14:12 PM
332 Views
Dude, WTF! This thread is like a year and a half old
- 18/10/2011 08:58:14 PM
332 Views
No need for commas in either of the lats 3 examples. *NM*
- 23/04/2010 03:02:38 PM
380 Views
You have Latvian lats? It's a sort of worthless currency for trading purposes. *NM*
- 23/04/2010 04:46:07 PM
392 Views
I tap three mana and cast Cancel. *NM*
- 23/04/2010 05:26:17 PM
387 Views
It won't work, the only way to banish the Grammar Nazi is with Text Messages
- 23/04/2010 11:41:51 PM
417 Views
You get...300 exposition points, a scroll of open/close quotes, and a direct object. *NM*
- 24/04/2010 02:32:48 AM
384 Views
Apparently someone also cast Necromancy (Resurrect Deceased Thread). *NM*
- 18/10/2011 07:30:02 PM
332 Views


*NM*