Active Users:336 Time:01/07/2025 09:37:24 PM
This is what I alluded to in my response. Joel Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 01:44:14 AM
Under old law the police could not interrogate you for hours if you were remaining silent. At some point it becomes obvious that a reasonable person is exercising their right to remain silent, and the police would have to stop.


I don't know the specifics of the law so I'm not calling you out on this, just asking a question. That question being, "what would have kept an unscrupulous cop from deciding it wasn't clear?" Was there anything in the law that forced them to stop at a certain point, or just to use their judgment? Even in the latter case, I would assume they'd get at least 5-10 minutes of badgering before they had to throw in the towel. With the new ruling, a person can stop it before it even begins. If anything, this is an expansion of a person's rights.

This ruling doesn't create the potential for a new abuse, because if cops wanted to ignore peoples rights and try to get away with it they were already going to do so. That's a very real problem, but not one born of this ruling. They aren't going to put cameras in interrogation rooms because of this; they already have them, to protect both suspects and officers.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Update: Right to remain silent? Suspect better speak up - - 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM 1123 Views
What I don't like about this decision... - 01/06/2010 08:21:02 PM 711 Views
I think the only potential issue is if the person didn't understand the Miranda warning. - 01/06/2010 10:37:42 PM 644 Views
Damn you common sense!!! *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:56:17 AM 279 Views
that is an odd way of looking at it - 01/06/2010 11:58:12 PM 657 Views
I'm more referring to the almost "magic words" that Kennedy introduces here. - 02/06/2010 12:18:07 AM 676 Views
So we should not allow police to question people at all? - 02/06/2010 12:31:27 AM 607 Views
You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit. - 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM 603 Views
The goal is not to keep guilty people from confessing - 02/06/2010 01:48:48 AM 625 Views
The way I see it... - 02/06/2010 03:06:01 AM 747 Views
Seems reasonable to me - 01/06/2010 09:44:30 PM 739 Views
This seems reasonable to me. - 01/06/2010 09:47:34 PM 685 Views
Hey deaf people who can't speak... pound sand. - 01/06/2010 09:55:41 PM 739 Views
well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview - 02/06/2010 12:26:31 AM 636 Views
Re: well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview - 02/06/2010 03:57:35 AM 643 Views
you are often questioned by the police? What are you doing to make that happen? - 02/06/2010 03:35:47 PM 681 Views
I travel internationally - 02/06/2010 08:40:38 PM 649 Views
This decision is a setback for us all. - 01/06/2010 10:10:51 PM 755 Views
No it isn't. - 01/06/2010 10:42:06 PM 671 Views
Re: No it isn't. - 01/06/2010 11:26:07 PM 679 Views
bah - 02/06/2010 12:11:46 AM 636 Views
Teach people to say "I'm not saying anything until my lawyer gets here." Period. *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:38:24 AM 267 Views
Close, but not cigar. - 02/06/2010 01:30:19 AM 688 Views
if they catch more bad guys is that a bad thing? *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:50:12 AM 286 Views
Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate? - 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM 648 Views
I think you have to have reasonable balance - 02/06/2010 05:48:31 PM 704 Views
You are at the intersection of bull and shit. - 02/06/2010 04:00:32 PM 672 Views
Re: You are at the intersection of bull and shit. - 02/06/2010 10:18:36 PM 662 Views
Hey douchebag, you're still wrong. - 02/06/2010 10:34:48 PM 644 Views
Any particular reason you started the name calling? - 02/06/2010 10:58:47 PM 582 Views
At what point did that happen? - 02/06/2010 01:26:13 AM 605 Views
This is what I alluded to in my response. - 02/06/2010 01:44:14 AM 708 Views
Re: At what point did that happen? - 02/06/2010 01:48:52 AM 728 Views
I am confused - 01/06/2010 11:09:14 PM 659 Views
Re: I am confused - 01/06/2010 11:15:07 PM 590 Views
ummm, no... - 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM 683 Views
Re: ummm, no... - 02/06/2010 01:38:54 AM 626 Views
spare me the pontificating - 02/06/2010 01:50:27 AM 721 Views
Re: spare me the pontificating - 02/06/2010 02:01:27 AM 613 Views
you never wave your right to remain silent forever - 02/06/2010 01:53:07 AM 598 Views
It's perhaps odd that we're on opposite sides of this. - 02/06/2010 01:59:46 AM 633 Views
Nothing has changed - 02/06/2010 01:56:08 AM 625 Views
As far as I can tell, this changes nothing and simply maintains the status quo. - 01/06/2010 11:27:36 PM 649 Views
An interesting way of looking at it at the end. - 02/06/2010 02:05:34 AM 715 Views
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear. - 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM 701 Views
Good advice - 02/06/2010 04:00:45 AM 585 Views
I always love in the TV shows when... - 02/06/2010 04:16:35 AM 682 Views
Re: I always love in the TV shows when... - 02/06/2010 04:36:34 AM 775 Views

Reply to Message