Active Users:939 Time:12/07/2026 09:35:33 PM
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM
If arrested and put in an interrogation room should refuse all conversation and request a lawyer. You should NEVER engage in small talk and answer any questions or ask any questions. You should repeat again that you would like a lawyer. Again, do NOT engage in any small talk.

You should also never, ever go down "voluntarily" if asked to for an "interview" without a lawyer. You should have the officer write his contact information down, inform him that you will contact your lawyer as soon as possible and have him/her set up an interview time when everyone can meet.

The police spend hours and hours learning "soft" interrogation techniques that are designed to use small talk and conversation to get you to reveal more detailed information. They are crafty. That is the interrogator's job. You are not in the interview room because the police want to know how your family is doing, whether you are thirsty or not, what church you go to, who your friends are, or anything else.

Often they start with techniques like conversation and small talk after they have informed you of any rights to have a lawyer present in order to get you to overlook the fact that you don't have to say a word to them without one present. And if one thing is for sure, once they have you talking about irrelevant bullshit they will guide you nice and easy into talking about what is relevant (to them).

Be smart about "interviews". The police are not your friends in such a situation. Ever. Always ask for a lawyer and talk about nothing else until your lawyer is there and can find out what they want to talk to you about.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
This message last edited by everynametaken on 02/06/2010 at 02:00:05 AM
Reply to message
SCOTUS Update: Right to remain silent? Suspect better speak up - - 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM 1270 Views
What I don't like about this decision... - 01/06/2010 08:21:02 PM 838 Views
I think the only potential issue is if the person didn't understand the Miranda warning. - 01/06/2010 10:37:42 PM 770 Views
Damn you common sense!!! *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:56:17 AM 329 Views
that is an odd way of looking at it - 01/06/2010 11:58:12 PM 793 Views
I'm more referring to the almost "magic words" that Kennedy introduces here. - 02/06/2010 12:18:07 AM 801 Views
So we should not allow police to question people at all? - 02/06/2010 12:31:27 AM 728 Views
You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit. - 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM 712 Views
The goal is not to keep guilty people from confessing - 02/06/2010 01:48:48 AM 746 Views
The way I see it... - 02/06/2010 03:06:01 AM 875 Views
Seems reasonable to me - 01/06/2010 09:44:30 PM 866 Views
This seems reasonable to me. - 01/06/2010 09:47:34 PM 816 Views
Hey deaf people who can't speak... pound sand. - 01/06/2010 09:55:41 PM 870 Views
well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview - 02/06/2010 12:26:31 AM 752 Views
Re: well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview - 02/06/2010 03:57:35 AM 769 Views
you are often questioned by the police? What are you doing to make that happen? - 02/06/2010 03:35:47 PM 804 Views
I travel internationally - 02/06/2010 08:40:38 PM 773 Views
This decision is a setback for us all. - 01/06/2010 10:10:51 PM 887 Views
No it isn't. - 01/06/2010 10:42:06 PM 798 Views
Re: No it isn't. - 01/06/2010 11:26:07 PM 809 Views
bah - 02/06/2010 12:11:46 AM 751 Views
Teach people to say "I'm not saying anything until my lawyer gets here." Period. *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:38:24 AM 323 Views
Close, but not cigar. - 02/06/2010 01:30:19 AM 813 Views
if they catch more bad guys is that a bad thing? *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:50:12 AM 333 Views
Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate? - 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM 774 Views
I think you have to have reasonable balance - 02/06/2010 05:48:31 PM 831 Views
You are at the intersection of bull and shit. - 02/06/2010 04:00:32 PM 793 Views
Re: You are at the intersection of bull and shit. - 02/06/2010 10:18:36 PM 791 Views
Hey douchebag, you're still wrong. - 02/06/2010 10:34:48 PM 769 Views
Any particular reason you started the name calling? - 02/06/2010 10:58:47 PM 708 Views
At what point did that happen? - 02/06/2010 01:26:13 AM 733 Views
This is what I alluded to in my response. - 02/06/2010 01:44:14 AM 828 Views
Re: At what point did that happen? - 02/06/2010 01:48:52 AM 856 Views
I am confused - 01/06/2010 11:09:14 PM 782 Views
Re: I am confused - 01/06/2010 11:15:07 PM 719 Views
ummm, no... - 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM 808 Views
Re: ummm, no... - 02/06/2010 01:38:54 AM 756 Views
spare me the pontificating - 02/06/2010 01:50:27 AM 850 Views
Re: spare me the pontificating - 02/06/2010 02:01:27 AM 737 Views
you never wave your right to remain silent forever - 02/06/2010 01:53:07 AM 721 Views
It's perhaps odd that we're on opposite sides of this. - 02/06/2010 01:59:46 AM 759 Views
Nothing has changed - 02/06/2010 01:56:08 AM 755 Views
As far as I can tell, this changes nothing and simply maintains the status quo. - 01/06/2010 11:27:36 PM 773 Views
An interesting way of looking at it at the end. - 02/06/2010 02:05:34 AM 834 Views
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear. - 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM 845 Views
Good advice - 02/06/2010 04:00:45 AM 706 Views
I always love in the TV shows when... - 02/06/2010 04:16:35 AM 813 Views
Re: I always love in the TV shows when... - 02/06/2010 04:36:34 AM 897 Views

Reply to Message