Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate?
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM
There's a reason we have Constitutional rights. Casting a wider net means you'll probably catch more criminals, but you're going to "catch"--and convict--more innocents to.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
SCOTUS Update: Right to remain silent? Suspect better speak up -
- 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM
1161 Views
What I don't like about this decision...
- 01/06/2010 08:21:02 PM
741 Views
I think the only potential issue is if the person didn't understand the Miranda warning.
- 01/06/2010 10:37:42 PM
674 Views
that is an odd way of looking at it
- 01/06/2010 11:58:12 PM
686 Views
I'm more referring to the almost "magic words" that Kennedy introduces here.
- 02/06/2010 12:18:07 AM
705 Views
So we should not allow police to question people at all?
- 02/06/2010 12:31:27 AM
638 Views
You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit.
- 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM
629 Views
Forgot to mention - the 5-4 decision was split between cons and libs, but.....
- 01/06/2010 08:36:41 PM
642 Views
This seems reasonable to me.
- 01/06/2010 09:47:34 PM
717 Views
I'm stunned. Your response was reasoned, logical and concise. What have you done with Joel?
- 01/06/2010 10:43:22 PM
678 Views
Joel is going to be so pissed when he finds out that you logged onto his account.....
- 02/06/2010 01:42:50 AM
688 Views
Hey deaf people who can't speak... pound sand.
- 01/06/2010 09:55:41 PM
771 Views
well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview
- 02/06/2010 12:26:31 AM
668 Views
Re: well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview
- 02/06/2010 03:57:35 AM
680 Views
you are often questioned by the police? What are you doing to make that happen?
- 02/06/2010 03:35:47 PM
713 Views
This decision is a setback for us all.
- 01/06/2010 10:10:51 PM
786 Views
No it isn't.
- 01/06/2010 10:42:06 PM
699 Views
Re: No it isn't.
- 01/06/2010 11:26:07 PM
716 Views
Teach people to say "I'm not saying anything until my lawyer gets here." Period. *NM*
- 02/06/2010 12:38:24 AM
281 Views
Close, but not cigar.
- 02/06/2010 01:30:19 AM
718 Views
if they catch more bad guys is that a bad thing? *NM*
- 02/06/2010 01:50:12 AM
297 Views
Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate?
- 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM
682 Views
You are at the intersection of bull and shit.
- 02/06/2010 04:00:32 PM
699 Views
I am confused
- 01/06/2010 11:09:14 PM
686 Views
Re: I am confused
- 01/06/2010 11:15:07 PM
626 Views
ummm, no...
- 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM
715 Views
Re: ummm, no...
- 02/06/2010 01:38:54 AM
656 Views
Nothing has changed
- 02/06/2010 01:56:08 AM
659 Views
Except you risk waiving them unless you specifically say you want to use them.
- 02/06/2010 04:07:51 AM
672 Views
not surprising that people who use phrases like "Police State of America" believe that
- 02/06/2010 03:24:25 PM
678 Views
As far as I can tell, this changes nothing and simply maintains the status quo.
- 01/06/2010 11:27:36 PM
679 Views
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear.
- 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM
734 Views
Good advice
- 02/06/2010 04:00:45 AM
618 Views

*NM*
