Active Users:505 Time:14/10/2025 02:15:52 PM
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM
It's not like a holy writing becomes illegitimate just by being apocalyptic. It's either accepted or it's not. The deeper question is why such passages would be written in the first place. Of course, the promise to give Abrahams descendants Canaan is no more unique to Judaism than God telling Abraham to sacrifice his son to see if he trusts God to come through for him. There's a BIT more to the Palestinian/Israeli conflict than just kicking people off their dads land, though that certainly plays a role.

Not illegitimate, irrelevant. It's very hard to take Revelations seriously, and the parts about the "shoes made of hair" and "faces like shields" and all that makes the Muslim apocalyptic predictions almost as silly.

It's undeniable that large amounts of Muslims now are anti-semitic and claim religious reasons for that, including that verse, and they completely ignore the apocalyptic aspect of it, or the verse right next to it saying they'll wage war on the Turks. And obviously they're not going to change that just because I say so, or Tom says so. But at the very least we can keep pointing out that it's fake, it's propaganda.

Oh, I realize all of that, but the stories of conflict between Jew and Arab didn't happen in a vacuum. They may not have been universally accepted (and after the Exile that's more likely than not, since the Jews were scattered to the four winds on at least three separate occasions) but there's SOME basis there even if it was just some Jewish guy who really hated Arabs and wrote nasty things about them to disseminate to his fellow Jews.

The point is that at the time the Israeli-Palestinian conflict originated - to a certain extent in the first decades of the previous century, and full-blown in the twenties - there was no real reason why Jews and Arabs should hate each other. And if there wasn't then, there's no reason why there should be now, not anything other than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict itself. Both religions have enough ambiguous or interpretation-dependent material in their religious books that they could've produced propaganda of a similar nature against various other nations or ethnicities if the need arose.
Reply to message
Jacqueline Rose on the Dreyfus affair and related problems, in the LRB - 06/06/2010 11:28:14 AM 1222 Views
What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:48:16 PM 1006 Views
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM 931 Views
*remains amused at the suggestion of the Dreyfus Affairs "pertinence" to "current" events* - 06/06/2010 05:14:23 PM 935 Views
I agree in part and (strongly) disagree in part. - 06/06/2010 05:40:26 PM 906 Views
"If it's an eternal struggle, how could there ever be a solution or a peace?" - 06/06/2010 06:20:39 PM 981 Views
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM 826 Views
I second your main point. - 07/06/2010 12:09:42 AM 864 Views
I don't discount that there is Arab blood in many or even most "Arabs". - 07/06/2010 12:18:32 AM 826 Views
Okay, fair enough then. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:45:19 AM 372 Views
The holiday is centuries old and real, regardless. - 07/06/2010 12:28:59 AM 925 Views
You're still missing the major point here. - 07/06/2010 12:44:08 AM 824 Views
That seems a rather limited view of history. - 07/06/2010 01:10:11 AM 932 Views
What the Hell are you going on about? - 07/06/2010 04:08:19 AM 897 Views
Oooh - 07/06/2010 11:07:43 AM 727 Views
Yeah, to whom was the claim on that land given? - 07/06/2010 10:35:42 PM 858 Views
jeez Joel... - 07/06/2010 04:24:47 AM 869 Views
No, the Persians are not Arabs. - 07/06/2010 10:09:47 PM 1014 Views
I (coincidentally) stumbled across those infamous hadith passages about Jews the other day. - 07/06/2010 09:41:39 AM 918 Views
So? - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM 894 Views
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM 853 Views
Not to mention - 08/06/2010 09:09:27 AM 751 Views
Then why are they canon? - 08/06/2010 06:25:09 PM 1055 Views
are you claiming that people would pull some things out of holy text and ignore the rest? - 08/06/2010 12:16:41 PM 914 Views
*NM* - 08/06/2010 01:16:13 PM 356 Views
well, for me this just proves why we are not supposed to live among non-Jews - 06/06/2010 11:39:45 PM 1021 Views
how so? - 06/06/2010 11:41:18 PM 763 Views
It reminds me of what I kept thinking as I read it. - 07/06/2010 12:51:36 AM 815 Views
couldn't get past the part where anyone who opposes Obama is a racist *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:40:07 AM 540 Views
You hallucinated? *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:39:37 AM 414 Views
No, that would've been one of the places where she should've shut up. *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:58:11 AM 352 Views
No - 08/06/2010 09:08:04 AM 794 Views
I think he's not talking about that bit, but about the very first paragraph. - 08/06/2010 09:30:21 AM 922 Views
If there was more I didn't get far enough to hear it - 08/06/2010 12:09:47 PM 780 Views
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM 831 Views
The problem is blatant bias - 08/06/2010 02:24:57 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message