Just a bunch of people from opposite political extremes shouting past each other indefatigably. And we wonder why people are so disillusioned and cynical about politics; public service has long ceased to be relevant, let alone a priority, and instead been supplanted by personal agendas.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd....
20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM
- 1501 Views
She has a point. Bush had the guts to weather the storm on DPW.
20/08/2010 12:42:21 AM
- 903 Views
DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
20/08/2010 12:50:14 AM
- 767 Views
Re: DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
20/08/2010 12:56:44 AM
- 1032 Views
Once again, listen to the Economist and don't use abbreviations that aren't obvious.
20/08/2010 06:38:08 PM
- 786 Views
That abbreviation was obvious and all over the place at the time the incident happened.
20/08/2010 07:59:08 PM
- 820 Views
I certainly don't remember seeing it anywhere. The abbreviation was unnecessary in any event.
20/08/2010 10:43:05 PM
- 748 Views
Sure, I could've done that, if I had realized it would puzzle people. I did not. *NM*
20/08/2010 10:59:42 PM
- 489 Views
well since Christie is actually a republican he makes a better example than Bloomberg
20/08/2010 01:53:44 PM
- 843 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker?
20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM
- 707 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen
20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
- 858 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising
20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM
- 1009 Views
I'm aware of that
20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM
- 734 Views
Re: I'm aware of that
21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM
- 1017 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why.
21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM
- 815 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic.
21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM
- 1145 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position.
20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM
- 956 Views
When has logical consistency trumped politics?
*NM*
20/08/2010 01:50:55 PM
- 399 Views

True, but it does mean there's no "there" there.
20/08/2010 02:41:49 PM
- 776 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues
20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM
- 1014 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity...
20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM
- 902 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied?
20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM
- 971 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking.
20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM
- 989 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious.
21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM
- 726 Views
Then restating it for those who refused to hear it, so that someone else could refuse to hear it.
21/08/2010 04:22:30 PM
- 992 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM*
21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM
- 364 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly?
21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM
- 1043 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick?
21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM
- 1054 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech)
22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM
- 1006 Views
did you take into your consideration
22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM
- 749 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them
22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM
- 944 Views
I agree he is not backtracking
22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM
- 852 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland.
22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
- 778 Views

I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works
22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM
- 802 Views
nope just human
*NM*
22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
- 426 Views

that's not what Paul just said.
22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
- 867 Views

He couldn't stay out, no.
22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM
- 907 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax.
22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
- 920 Views

key word: seem
22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM
- 840 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you
22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM
- 739 Views
Seems I interpret his speech on the iftar differently from you and Tash - see my reply to Tash. *NM*
22/08/2010 09:25:13 PM
- 502 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM*
22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM
- 486 Views
Joel
22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM
- 1055 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
- 973 Views
nonsense
22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM
- 917 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener.
22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM
- 892 Views
so we have reached the point of no return...
22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM
- 903 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2.
22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM
- 877 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here...
22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM
- 709 Views
lol.<3
22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
- 881 Views

that it is...
22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM
- 880 Views
hee. Well, I still don't agree with you, but at least you're snuggly.^_^ *NM*
22/08/2010 09:09:22 PM
- 665 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
- 978 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact.
22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM
- 911 Views
I really have to disagree with your interpretation of that first speech.
22/08/2010 09:22:32 PM
- 1176 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh?
22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
- 1368 Views

that was a decent explanation....
22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM
- 819 Views
In the interests of fairness ( this does not support or detract from my position), here is the full
22/08/2010 09:22:50 PM
- 1106 Views