Active Users:517 Time:16/10/2025 07:25:00 PM
True, but it does mean there's no "there" there. Joel Send a noteboard - 20/08/2010 02:41:49 PM
Just a bunch of people from opposite political extremes shouting past each other indefatigably. And we wonder why people are so disillusioned and cynical about politics; public service has long ceased to be relevant, let alone a priority, and instead been supplanted by personal agendas.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd.... - 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM 1501 Views
wow, that was an interesting read - 20/08/2010 02:03:52 AM 863 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker? - 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM 707 Views
We've been through this, too, haven't we? - 20/08/2010 10:12:15 AM 1000 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen - 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM 858 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising - 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM 1009 Views
I'm aware of that - 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM 734 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM 1017 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 01:19:37 AM 881 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 01:59:48 AM 766 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why. - 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM 815 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic. - 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM 1145 Views
"One man, one vote" always reminds me of Pratchett - 21/08/2010 05:03:35 PM 791 Views
Me too *NM* - 21/08/2010 06:53:22 PM 495 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position. - 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM 956 Views
When has logical consistency trumped politics? *NM* - 20/08/2010 01:50:55 PM 399 Views
True, but it does mean there's no "there" there. - 20/08/2010 02:41:49 PM 776 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues - 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM 1014 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity... - 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM 902 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied? - 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM 971 Views
Ask and ye shall receive: - 21/08/2010 06:42:50 PM 1146 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking. - 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM 989 Views
that sort of illustrates the problem - 20/08/2010 08:56:42 PM 835 Views
It does - 22/08/2010 04:56:54 PM 752 Views
Can't find anything now on the context of the second statement. - 21/08/2010 05:05:51 PM 880 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious. - 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM 726 Views
maybe - 21/08/2010 02:49:40 AM 974 Views
Wow that is probably the best Dowd column I have ever read - 21/08/2010 01:35:36 AM 754 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM* - 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM 364 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly? - 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM 1043 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick? - 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM 1054 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech) - 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM 1006 Views
*NM* - 22/08/2010 01:37:23 PM 398 Views
did you take into your consideration - 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM 749 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them - 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM 944 Views
that would be - 22/08/2010 04:02:08 PM 1031 Views
But quote B just reiterated what he said the first time. - 22/08/2010 04:13:21 PM 865 Views
I agree he is not backtracking - 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM 852 Views
I agree with you, Joel and Tash on this one. - 22/08/2010 07:52:34 PM 927 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland. - 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM 778 Views
I never fail to be impressed with your intelligence - 22/08/2010 08:25:11 PM 928 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works - 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM 802 Views
nope just human *NM* - 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM 426 Views
that's not what Paul just said. - 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM 867 Views
He couldn't stay out, no. - 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM 907 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax. - 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM 920 Views
key word: seem - 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM 840 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you - 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM 739 Views
good thing - 22/08/2010 09:39:52 PM 1137 Views
he could have and should have stayed out - 22/08/2010 09:57:57 PM 875 Views
I think he's certainly got rhetoric talents... - 22/08/2010 08:54:11 PM 1302 Views
You don't really seem like you're taking a side to me. - 22/08/2010 09:14:02 PM 958 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM* - 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM 486 Views
Except, of course, that you just did. - 22/08/2010 12:30:00 PM 875 Views
Joel - 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM 1055 Views
That last line was golden. *NM* - 22/08/2010 05:40:56 AM 453 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right. - 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM 973 Views
nonsense - 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM 917 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener. - 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM 892 Views
so we have reached the point of no return... - 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM 903 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2. - 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM 877 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here... - 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM 709 Views
lol.<3 - 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM 881 Views
that it is... - 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM 880 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world - 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM 978 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact. - 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM 911 Views
On the off chance that this: - 23/08/2010 12:38:48 AM 1075 Views
I do remember your reply... - 23/08/2010 02:57:29 AM 1303 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh? - 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM 1368 Views
that was a decent explanation.... - 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM 819 Views
Thanks. - 22/08/2010 05:41:28 PM 879 Views
I do feel bad for them - 22/08/2010 08:40:36 PM 776 Views
Re: Joel - 22/08/2010 07:53:51 PM 921 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 22/08/2010 08:25:38 PM 552 Views

Reply to Message