Just a bunch of people from opposite political extremes shouting past each other indefatigably. And we wonder why people are so disillusioned and cynical about politics; public service has long ceased to be relevant, let alone a priority, and instead been supplanted by personal agendas.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd....
- 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM
1537 Views
She has a point. Bush had the guts to weather the storm on DPW.
- 20/08/2010 12:42:21 AM
932 Views
DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:50:14 AM
796 Views
Re: DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:56:44 AM
1065 Views
Once again, listen to the Economist and don't use abbreviations that aren't obvious.
- 20/08/2010 06:38:08 PM
823 Views
That abbreviation was obvious and all over the place at the time the incident happened.
- 20/08/2010 07:59:08 PM
858 Views
I certainly don't remember seeing it anywhere. The abbreviation was unnecessary in any event.
- 20/08/2010 10:43:05 PM
778 Views
Sure, I could've done that, if I had realized it would puzzle people. I did not. *NM*
- 20/08/2010 10:59:42 PM
503 Views
well since Christie is actually a republican he makes a better example than Bloomberg
- 20/08/2010 01:53:44 PM
883 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker?
- 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM
741 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen
- 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
893 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising
- 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM
1037 Views
I'm aware of that
- 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM
771 Views
Re: I'm aware of that
- 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM
1047 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why.
- 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM
852 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic.
- 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM
1184 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position.
- 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM
995 Views
When has logical consistency trumped politics?
*NM*
- 20/08/2010 01:50:55 PM
412 Views
*NM*
- 20/08/2010 01:50:55 PM
412 Views
True, but it does mean there's no "there" there.
- 20/08/2010 02:41:49 PM
820 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues
- 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM
1046 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity...
- 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM
936 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied?
- 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM
1012 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking.
- 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM
1026 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious.
- 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM
759 Views
Then restating it for those who refused to hear it, so that someone else could refuse to hear it.
- 21/08/2010 04:22:30 PM
1026 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM*
- 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM
381 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly?
- 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM
1083 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick?
- 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM
1099 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech)
- 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM
1038 Views
did you take into your consideration
- 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM
784 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them
- 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM
970 Views
I agree he is not backtracking
- 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM
882 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland.
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
809 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
809 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works
- 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM
829 Views
nope just human
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
441 Views
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
441 Views
that's not what Paul just said.
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
898 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
898 Views
He couldn't stay out, no.
- 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM
962 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax.
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
953 Views
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
953 Views
key word: seem
- 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM
882 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you
- 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM
769 Views
Seems I interpret his speech on the iftar differently from you and Tash - see my reply to Tash. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:25:13 PM
515 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM
503 Views
Joel
- 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM
1093 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
- 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
1003 Views
nonsense
- 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM
946 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener.
- 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM
923 Views
so we have reached the point of no return...
- 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM
933 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2.
- 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM
908 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here...
- 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM
739 Views
lol.<3
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
918 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
918 Views
that it is...
- 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM
926 Views
hee. Well, I still don't agree with you, but at least you're snuggly.^_^ *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:09:22 PM
677 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
- 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
1010 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact.
- 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM
941 Views
I really have to disagree with your interpretation of that first speech.
- 22/08/2010 09:22:32 PM
1208 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh?
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1396 Views
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1396 Views
that was a decent explanation....
- 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM
847 Views
In the interests of fairness ( this does not support or detract from my position), here is the full
- 22/08/2010 09:22:50 PM
1154 Views
