Probably because there are too many hits for the first statement when I do a search; best I can do between shifts is a link to the video and transcript of that, and in its entirety the tone is a little less skeptical of the planned mosque.

http://enduringamerica.com/2010/08/15/video-and-transcript-president-obamas-speech-on-the-mosque-at-ground-zero/

It's still a long way from an endorsement or "supporting the mosque" as members of both parties and factions have called it; supporting the right to something isn't supporting the act itself, but part of the Dems problem has been their failure to articulate that combined with the countrys unwillingness to accept it. Too often it seems when people say, "just because you think something is morally wrong doesn't give you the legal right to ban it" what they mean is "just because you think what I'm doing is wrong doesn't make you any less full of it, and the law is on my side. " Of course, the moment the shoe's on the other foot all that noble cerebral logic is out the window; if you want abortion to remain legal, you must fantasize about strangling infants; if you want homosexual marriage to be legal, you must be Liberace back from the dead. I mean, what kind of idiot would support someones RIGHT to do things that disgust him?