His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
Tashmere Send a noteboard - 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
What he did was overestimate the ability of his audience to understand that. But most people passed over it because they wanted to. They were looking for something to jump on and they twisted and cut it so that they had something to whine about.
I am sick to death of people doing crap like this. Apparently, Dostoevsky is right. People find satisfaction in misery. Whatever.
I am sick to death of people doing crap like this. Apparently, Dostoevsky is right. People find satisfaction in misery. Whatever.
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd....
- 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM
1538 Views
She has a point. Bush had the guts to weather the storm on DPW.
- 20/08/2010 12:42:21 AM
933 Views
DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:50:14 AM
797 Views
Re: DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:56:44 AM
1066 Views
Once again, listen to the Economist and don't use abbreviations that aren't obvious.
- 20/08/2010 06:38:08 PM
826 Views
That abbreviation was obvious and all over the place at the time the incident happened.
- 20/08/2010 07:59:08 PM
862 Views
I certainly don't remember seeing it anywhere. The abbreviation was unnecessary in any event.
- 20/08/2010 10:43:05 PM
779 Views
Sure, I could've done that, if I had realized it would puzzle people. I did not. *NM*
- 20/08/2010 10:59:42 PM
504 Views
well since Christie is actually a republican he makes a better example than Bloomberg
- 20/08/2010 01:53:44 PM
886 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker?
- 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM
745 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen
- 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
898 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising
- 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM
1041 Views
I'm aware of that
- 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM
772 Views
Re: I'm aware of that
- 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM
1050 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why.
- 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM
853 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic.
- 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM
1185 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position.
- 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM
996 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues
- 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM
1051 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity...
- 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM
940 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied?
- 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM
1013 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking.
- 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM
1030 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious.
- 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM
760 Views
Then restating it for those who refused to hear it, so that someone else could refuse to hear it.
- 21/08/2010 04:22:30 PM
1027 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM*
- 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM
382 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly?
- 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM
1085 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick?
- 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM
1103 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech)
- 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM
1039 Views
did you take into your consideration
- 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM
785 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them
- 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM
972 Views
I agree he is not backtracking
- 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM
884 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland.
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
810 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
810 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works
- 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM
830 Views
nope just human
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
442 Views
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
442 Views
that's not what Paul just said.
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
899 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
899 Views
He couldn't stay out, no.
- 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM
963 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax.
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
954 Views
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
954 Views
key word: seem
- 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM
883 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you
- 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM
770 Views
Seems I interpret his speech on the iftar differently from you and Tash - see my reply to Tash. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:25:13 PM
516 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM
506 Views
Joel
- 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM
1095 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
- 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
1005 Views
nonsense
- 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM
951 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener.
- 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM
924 Views
so we have reached the point of no return...
- 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM
934 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2.
- 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM
909 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here...
- 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM
740 Views
lol.<3
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
919 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
919 Views
that it is...
- 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM
927 Views
hee. Well, I still don't agree with you, but at least you're snuggly.^_^ *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:09:22 PM
678 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
- 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
1011 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact.
- 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM
942 Views
I really have to disagree with your interpretation of that first speech.
- 22/08/2010 09:22:32 PM
1209 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh?
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1397 Views
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1397 Views
that was a decent explanation....
- 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM
848 Views
In the interests of fairness ( this does not support or detract from my position), here is the full
- 22/08/2010 09:22:50 PM
1155 Views
