Active Users:1063 Time:02/11/2025 10:39:43 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I think... Hezzah Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM
That if they have to have a warrant to search your car, then that makes it private property, like your home. So, to me, it shouldn't be legal for them to mess with your car, let alone put a GPS tracker on it, to watch your movements.
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1656 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 974 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1204 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1023 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 953 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1023 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 979 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1050 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 944 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1076 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 471 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 997 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1163 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1043 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 933 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1029 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1062 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 464 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 505 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 986 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1047 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 901 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1050 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 886 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1050 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1028 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 955 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1272 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 451 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 513 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1057 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 952 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 877 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 883 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 942 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1163 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 450 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1090 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1032 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 976 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1041 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1080 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1180 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1145 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1011 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 889 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 950 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 477 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 984 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 395 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 910 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1203 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 468 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1021 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 986 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes