Active Users:2934 Time:03/05/2026 01:31:16 PM
but effective random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM
A police officer does not have to be endanger to use a taser. He or she can use a taser to keep from being put in a dangerous situation. That means if you are ordered by a police officer to comply and refuse he has the choice between fighting you and tasing you. Fighting you can be dangerous so you get tased. Your choice. He doesn't have to just stand there and keep telling you over and over.

Now there are a few cases we it looks like someone was tased when they shouldn't have been but it isn't different then when they would use a nightstick when they didn't need to. Most of the case I see people getting upset over the person who got tasered was at fault.
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1745 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1086 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1296 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1109 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1046 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1127 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1119 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1127 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1030 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1165 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1098 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1248 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1134 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 1011 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1124 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1157 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 508 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 566 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1093 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1133 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 995 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1145 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 999 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1153 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1125 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1052 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1366 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 566 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1162 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1054 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 980 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 982 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1033 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1268 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1185 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1140 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1064 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1151 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1195 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1265 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1249 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1113 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 983 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1048 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 532 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1069 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 441 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 1005 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1314 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 509 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1120 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1071 Views

Reply to Message