Active Users:2308 Time:18/06/2026 04:12:47 AM
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM
This cannot be allowed to contine...



Whether the government putting the GPS tracker on somebody's vehicle is okay or not, and where it is or isn't acceptable for them to do that.

If we accept that it's okay for the government to put a GPS tracker on somebody's vehicle, that should be able to happen wherever it can be done without breaking some other law. I assume that somebody walking onto an unrestricted driveway is not breaking any other law in doing so. Presumably climbing over a locked fence or entering an unlocked garage would be violating tresspassing laws, but this seems potentially murkier. Breaking into a locked garage is right out ;)
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1769 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1110 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1319 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1131 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1072 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1153 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1144 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1151 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1055 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1192 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1122 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1271 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1157 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 1035 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1151 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1179 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 522 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 579 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1114 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1156 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 1020 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1180 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 1023 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1177 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1149 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1074 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1389 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 579 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1191 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1076 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 1013 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 1008 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1063 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1289 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1209 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1167 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1088 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1178 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1221 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1290 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1276 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1142 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 1007 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1067 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 541 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1092 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 455 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 1035 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1336 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 524 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1142 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1100 Views

Reply to Message