Active Users:639 Time:15/10/2025 11:50:14 PM
but effective random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM
A police officer does not have to be endanger to use a taser. He or she can use a taser to keep from being put in a dangerous situation. That means if you are ordered by a police officer to comply and refuse he has the choice between fighting you and tasing you. Fighting you can be dangerous so you get tased. Your choice. He doesn't have to just stand there and keep telling you over and over.

Now there are a few cases we it looks like someone was tased when they shouldn't have been but it isn't different then when they would use a nightstick when they didn't need to. Most of the case I see people getting upset over the person who got tasered was at fault.
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1622 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 951 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1181 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1000 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 936 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1000 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 949 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1035 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 929 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1054 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 975 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1144 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1008 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 909 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1004 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1037 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 455 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 489 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 961 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1032 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 882 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1023 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 871 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1029 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1009 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 928 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1241 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 499 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1030 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 928 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 857 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 861 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 924 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1133 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1069 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1006 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 957 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1013 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1061 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1153 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1122 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 989 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 468 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 967 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 386 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 889 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1182 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 452 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 995 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 963 Views

Reply to Message