By definition, that's the information you want to make public to the world, and is every bit the same as posting pictures of your vacation on your office door. I think employers have every right to content you make publicly available, and have no problem at all with the idea. Of course, I've heard of employers who require that employees friend them or whatever, and I vehemently disagree with that.
HR looks at facebook.
- 13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
1053 Views
Your public profile is exactly that.
- 13/09/2010 07:34:17 PM
713 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
791 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
700 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
- 14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
694 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
- 14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
633 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
- 14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
624 Views
Public is public is public.
- 13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
646 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
- 13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
697 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
- 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
619 Views
Who? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
329 Views
Human resources. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
298 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
339 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
336 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
336 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
289 Views
Hmpf *NM*
- 14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
342 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
303 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
310 Views
Eh, no biggie.
- 14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
598 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
- 14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
622 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
599 Views
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
599 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
- 14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
618 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
554 Views
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
554 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
- 14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
614 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
- 14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
682 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
- 14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
566 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
- 14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
625 Views
I agree.
- 14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
588 Views
