By definition, that's the information you want to make public to the world, and is every bit the same as posting pictures of your vacation on your office door. I think employers have every right to content you make publicly available, and have no problem at all with the idea. Of course, I've heard of employers who require that employees friend them or whatever, and I vehemently disagree with that.
HR looks at facebook.
13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
- 1008 Views
Your public profile is exactly that.
13/09/2010 07:34:17 PM
- 673 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
- 748 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
- 665 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 652 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
- 593 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 584 Views
Public is public is public.
13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
- 610 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
- 663 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
- 576 Views
Who? *NM*
13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
- 311 Views
Human resources. *NM*
13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
- 279 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
- 322 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
- 321 Views

It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
- 273 Views
Hmpf *NM*
14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
- 325 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
- 287 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
- 292 Views
Eh, no biggie.
14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
- 553 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
- 580 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
- 555 Views

maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
- 585 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
- 513 Views

I'd say in that specific case...
14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
- 571 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
- 640 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
- 529 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
- 586 Views
I agree.
14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
- 546 Views