Active Users:360 Time:27/04/2024 01:05:44 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It makes sense StarEnight Send a noteboard - 13/09/2009 05:04:23 PM
This issue is so difficult. I wouldn't strip her of her medal if they honestly didn't know *but* How could they not? The facial structure, flat chest, and complete lack of curves are all male characteristics even without a penis. I've seen women that are body builders and they still have some residual feminine characteristics that this individual is obviously lacking.

Her body's natural production of testosterone has the same effect as one of the other competitors taking steroids. It creates an unfair advantage. I think it would be wrong to let her records stand since they could only really be broken by another athlete with a similar medical condition. (btw nobody tell China or they will be implanting them)

Wow I thought internal testicles only happened on medical dramas.
"There simply is nothing to which we can attach ourselves, no matter how hard we try. In time, things will change and the conditions that produced our current desires will be gone. Why then cling to them now?"

Master Hsing Yun, "The Indescribable"
Reply to message
Caster Semenya has male sex organs and no womb or ovaries everynametaken - 11/09/2009 12:24:30 PM 1294 Views
I think revoking the championship and a ban at this point would be plain wrong LadyLorraine - 11/09/2009 02:01:15 PM 678 Views
Well said. Lupine - 11/09/2009 02:10:31 PM 658 Views
agreed. *NM* Avendesora - 11/09/2009 02:36:06 PM 352 Views
I agree. *NM* @my - 11/09/2009 03:20:05 PM 343 Views
I agree it's not her fault, but she shouldn't keep her championship. Aemon - 11/09/2009 03:50:06 PM 642 Views
Possibly a quibble, but just trying to clarify... Sareitha Sedai - 11/09/2009 05:15:52 PM 735 Views
It makes sense StarEnight - 13/09/2009 05:04:23 PM 677 Views
I disagree Сталин - 11/09/2009 04:09:50 PM 985 Views
As bad as if feel for the athlete, I agree. *NM* ironclad - 11/09/2009 04:46:57 PM 322 Views
Ditto. Assuming she never knew about it, which remains to be seen. *NM* Wibble - 11/09/2009 08:08:29 PM 294 Views
To the extent that LadyLorraine means "at this point", I do agree with her... Sareitha Sedai - 11/09/2009 05:03:34 PM 729 Views
Sounds like she/he is more dude than chick..... trzaska2000 - 11/09/2009 02:42:33 PM 723 Views
not really. it only takes ONE mistake to cause her problems. LadyLorraine - 12/09/2009 03:19:06 AM 661 Views
It's not that simple with DNA either. Legolas - 12/09/2009 10:38:28 AM 753 Views
no it's not as simple as "XX" and "XY" LadyLorraine - 12/09/2009 03:02:03 PM 694 Views
I think it is a sad story random thoughts - 11/09/2009 04:34:29 PM 720 Views
I agree. everynametaken - 11/09/2009 09:20:35 PM 767 Views
I like I said, tragic random thoughts - 11/09/2009 09:34:57 PM 640 Views
I can't believe this whole thing is public Monkey - 11/09/2009 07:03:59 PM 764 Views
That's a good idea! Floffe - 11/09/2009 07:17:20 PM 661 Views
Yeah, seems fair. Medal, no record. Legolas - 11/09/2009 07:57:38 PM 620 Views
How could she not know something was different? Not developing a period would be a major sign. *NM* everynametaken - 11/09/2009 09:21:54 PM 315 Views
Not necessarily, depending on the rigors of her athletic training. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 11/09/2009 09:26:32 PM 294 Views
When do most girls get their first period? Around 12 or 13? everynametaken - 12/09/2009 07:34:23 AM 582 Views
Yes, but 14 or 15 isn't out of the ordinary *NM* Floffe - 12/09/2009 11:23:09 AM 311 Views
I didn't start until I was 17 *NM* LadyLorraine - 12/09/2009 03:02:28 PM 291 Views
That is a bit unusual. *shrugs* *NM* everynametaken - 13/09/2009 01:17:18 AM 301 Views
starting THAT late is, yes LadyLorraine - 13/09/2009 04:24:44 AM 859 Views
There are plenty of runners who do hard training that keeps them from getting a regular period Floffe - 11/09/2009 09:29:24 PM 690 Views
I'd say so too. Periods have a lot to do with % body fat. Lupine - 12/09/2009 12:28:46 AM 784 Views
Not at the age when a girl first develops her period. everynametaken - 12/09/2009 07:36:24 AM 672 Views
You have an odd understanding of what's normal... Lupine - 12/09/2009 02:51:37 PM 711 Views
And you are still missing the point. everynametaken - 13/09/2009 01:18:54 AM 610 Views
And you're missing the point Sareitha Sedai - 13/09/2009 01:39:46 AM 658 Views
What Sareitha said. Lupine - 13/09/2009 03:50:05 AM 811 Views
people develop 30lb tumors and never go to get them checked out random thoughts - 11/09/2009 09:36:18 PM 713 Views
Well, now that you put it that way I guess I could see that. *NM* everynametaken - 12/09/2009 07:37:18 AM 286 Views
Not that rare in athletes. Tashmere - 12/09/2009 01:06:27 AM 620 Views
like i said in my first post LadyLorraine - 12/09/2009 03:25:04 AM 679 Views
I like that idea. That is the most sensible solution. *NM* Tashmere - 12/09/2009 01:07:42 AM 272 Views
This whole thing has been handled disgracefully Sidious - 12/09/2009 12:37:35 PM 791 Views
Considering that similar questions have arisen before Sareitha Sedai - 13/09/2009 01:43:18 AM 827 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes