Active Users:608 Time:19/12/2025 12:08:32 AM
But does one sided morality work? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 12/10/2010 05:38:56 PM
The banks will operate in what they consider their own best interest without regards to your wellbeing. They will argue that their first obligation is to their stock holders. Wouldn't a lean holder’s first obligation be to their family? You did not enter a blood oath you enter a legal contract. A legal contract that leaves you the legal right to walk away at the cost of the home and your credit rating. Is it immoral to exercise that legal right? Is it rational to act against your own best interest by behaving in a “moral” manner with and company that feels no obligations about treating you in a moral way or their own debts for that matter? If a bank has the ability to walk away from a huge amount of debt they would do so without thinking about. They do not feel constrained by any concept of a gentleman’s contract.
Reply to message
Is walking away from a mortgage immoral? - 12/10/2010 04:45:43 PM 1538 Views
Just as a contract is a two way street - - 12/10/2010 05:12:09 PM 1024 Views
do we have a moral obligation to society? - 12/10/2010 06:00:17 PM 1008 Views
It's a good question - 14/10/2010 02:41:21 AM 917 Views
Sort of have to disagree... - 13/10/2010 02:52:07 AM 985 Views
That's not true actually - 14/10/2010 02:35:43 AM 916 Views
Of course it's immoral. - 12/10/2010 05:13:16 PM 989 Views
But does one sided morality work? - 12/10/2010 05:38:56 PM 1107 Views
That's the only kind of morality there is! What the hell is wrong with you? - 12/10/2010 08:15:55 PM 936 Views
nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again - 12/10/2010 09:34:33 PM 926 Views
Re: nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again - 15/10/2010 02:50:49 PM 1431 Views
well I really can't argue with the wrong is wrong end of story belief system - 15/10/2010 05:40:22 PM 1122 Views
A contract isn't a promise; it's a legal agreement. *NM* - 12/10/2010 06:25:24 PM 462 Views
Which is why contracts have to be pages and pages long and combed over by bloodsucking lawyers. - 12/10/2010 06:39:18 PM 968 Views
I would agree with you if contracts didn't provide for breaking them. - 12/10/2010 07:33:15 PM 816 Views
Hrm. - 12/10/2010 07:35:38 PM 1038 Views
It's not immoral to break the marriage contract. - 12/10/2010 08:19:50 PM 1080 Views
I don't see that as the flaw in my logic. - 12/10/2010 08:37:52 PM 992 Views
Re: I don't see that as the flaw in my logic. - 12/10/2010 09:00:00 PM 1070 Views
also - 12/10/2010 09:37:38 PM 933 Views
That makes no sense whatsoever. - 13/10/2010 11:38:06 PM 1069 Views
That must be why they have you sign something called an agreementory note *NM* - 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM 482 Views
Exactly *NM* - 12/10/2010 07:58:25 PM 449 Views
So, you think bankruptcy laws are immoral? - 13/10/2010 12:18:43 AM 961 Views
I don't think it's immoral at all. The contract usually specifies penalties for breach. - 12/10/2010 05:28:34 PM 1069 Views
I thought the answer might be something like that. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:35:35 PM 433 Views
that is close to the way I see it - 12/10/2010 05:45:25 PM 915 Views
It's both legal and immoral. - 12/10/2010 06:37:49 PM 996 Views
You didn't mention the third party - 12/10/2010 08:26:56 PM 846 Views
in a way I did since I did mention society - 12/10/2010 08:54:07 PM 994 Views
Thus the edit - 12/10/2010 09:10:53 PM 1016 Views
either way I think you made a good point *NM* - 12/10/2010 09:38:58 PM 424 Views
will those neighbors... - 14/10/2010 04:52:26 AM 1160 Views
All depends where you get your morals from, really. - 12/10/2010 08:28:41 PM 986 Views
I guess what i was trying to ask, at least in part - 12/10/2010 09:48:24 PM 989 Views
What if you look at it from the other perspective? - 12/10/2010 09:00:20 PM 1015 Views
do you think they would if they had a legal way to do it? - 12/10/2010 10:04:57 PM 970 Views
Good point. *NM* - 12/10/2010 11:10:26 PM 449 Views
Sure, you could do that. - 13/10/2010 01:54:55 AM 1008 Views
Much like the concept of morality itself. - 12/10/2010 11:47:23 PM 914 Views
I find this line particularly interesting. - 13/10/2010 12:13:18 AM 949 Views
Dunno. - 13/10/2010 12:56:56 AM 1040 Views
As a professional in financial services - no, it is not. - 13/10/2010 01:44:18 AM 950 Views
but almost nobody sees it that way - 13/10/2010 12:53:25 PM 954 Views
Is the deal that if you default, the bank gets the house and nothing else, though? - 13/10/2010 02:40:48 PM 938 Views
yes but the bank has a limited ability to collect - 13/10/2010 02:47:34 PM 857 Views
I think it's morally wrong to walk away from credit card debt. *NM* - 13/10/2010 09:43:11 PM 436 Views
I'm curious how you reconcile that - 13/10/2010 09:47:59 PM 969 Views
Collateral - 19/10/2010 07:21:14 PM 1464 Views
I agree, what do you think is different? - 13/10/2010 09:59:36 PM 964 Views
I lost sleep over it, but I did it anyway. - 13/10/2010 05:24:19 AM 1048 Views
OK what if you take it a step further - 13/10/2010 03:44:30 PM 1050 Views
Good question - 14/10/2010 05:13:41 AM 1014 Views
I have some questions about this issue. - 13/10/2010 08:14:37 AM 972 Views
how do those questions affect the morality of the situation? - 13/10/2010 03:20:14 PM 915 Views
Obviously, the essential difference is can't pay versus won't pay. - 13/10/2010 02:16:07 PM 939 Views
are you socializing your debt when it is a private bank? - 13/10/2010 03:14:48 PM 994 Views
You are when said bank requires a bailout. And very many of them do. - 13/10/2010 03:22:59 PM 935 Views
it is the home fault that the banks have to be bailed out - 13/10/2010 03:49:37 PM 982 Views
I believe it immoral to do harm. - 13/10/2010 04:38:28 PM 1004 Views
I really don't understand a system where this could be an advantage. - 13/10/2010 11:16:57 PM 945 Views
There's generally something like a 7 or 10 year limit on credit reporting here. - 13/10/2010 11:46:58 PM 966 Views
What's the use of suing someone who has no money? *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:48:47 PM 496 Views
You can garnish their wages. - 13/10/2010 11:49:36 PM 949 Views
With parsley? - 13/10/2010 11:51:37 PM 1024 Views
No, "someone" most certainly did not, wicked young Miss! Hmph! *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:52:40 PM 484 Views
If they suddenly come into some, you're entitled to it. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:07:34 AM 561 Views
Bit of a long shot. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:09:12 AM 431 Views
Very. Best to cover your bases though. *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:04:25 PM 451 Views
Not if the doctrine of election applies. - 14/10/2010 10:14:07 PM 919 Views
Are we not talking about credit companies going after people who owe them money? - 14/10/2010 10:18:47 PM 970 Views
Yeah, I guess we are. - 14/10/2010 10:28:40 PM 1000 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 03:09:18 AM 970 Views
I am currently in that situation... - 14/10/2010 05:03:23 AM 1073 Views
Re: I am currently in that situation... - 14/10/2010 05:49:24 PM 1283 Views
it is easy for me and others to be glib when it is just a theory *NM* - 14/10/2010 08:19:16 PM 436 Views

Reply to Message