Trust - goes both ways. If the bank expects to trust you to make payments (even when it is financially stupid to do so) then the flip side of that trust is to expect that the bank will be supportive and helpful with long term, trusthworthy customers when there are issues and problems in the other direction.
...at least with this part.
The typical agreement is that the bank will lend you $x and you will pay it back under the agreed upon terms. You are breaking that agreement by walking away from that loan. You said above the flip side is to expect the bank to be supportive and helpful. Unless that was part of the agreement, it's not really the flip side, is it?
In cases of the people defaulting, they are breaking the agreement. In cases where the bank isn't supportive or helpful...they still didn't break the agreement.
The contract is that you will pay them X etc. OR forfeit the property. That forfeit is every bit as much part of the contract as the other. Walking away isn't a breach of the agreement, it's simply selecting the other option available to you in the contract.
The article makes this quite clear. So do all mortgage documents.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.
Old Egyptian Blessing
Old Egyptian Blessing
Is walking away from a mortgage immoral?
- 12/10/2010 04:45:43 PM
1651 Views
Just as a contract is a two way street -
- 12/10/2010 05:12:09 PM
1124 Views
Sort of have to disagree...
- 13/10/2010 02:52:07 AM
1096 Views
That's not true actually
- 14/10/2010 02:35:43 AM
1005 Views
Of course it's immoral.
- 12/10/2010 05:13:16 PM
1081 Views
But does one sided morality work?
- 12/10/2010 05:38:56 PM
1200 Views
You asked about the morality of walking away when the borrower still has the ability to pay.
- 12/10/2010 07:31:10 PM
1002 Views
A company or organization cannot act morally or immorally? I strongly disagree. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 07:50:42 PM
497 Views
No, it cannot. However the individuals making the decisions for the company can. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:48:23 PM
437 Views
If banks can not behave in moral manner why should people be expected to behave in moral manner?
- 12/10/2010 08:07:56 PM
1086 Views
I'm not absolved of my obligations based on the bad behaviors of others.
- 12/10/2010 08:25:33 PM
978 Views
Because it's their moral obligation. Morality is not a trade, you act morally because it is right
- 12/10/2010 08:47:41 PM
1184 Views
That's the only kind of morality there is! What the hell is wrong with you?
- 12/10/2010 08:15:55 PM
1043 Views
nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again
- 12/10/2010 09:34:33 PM
1027 Views
Re: nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again
- 15/10/2010 02:50:49 PM
1526 Views
well I really can't argue with the wrong is wrong end of story belief system
- 15/10/2010 05:40:22 PM
1225 Views
A contract isn't a promise; it's a legal agreement. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 06:25:24 PM
507 Views
Which is why contracts have to be pages and pages long and combed over by bloodsucking lawyers.
- 12/10/2010 06:39:18 PM
1055 Views
I would agree with you if contracts didn't provide for breaking them.
- 12/10/2010 07:33:15 PM
908 Views
Hrm.
- 12/10/2010 07:35:38 PM
1162 Views
did you take a personal oath in front of god and your loved ones to pay the loan back? *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:09:07 PM
509 Views
Let's assume we're talking about a marriage where no such oath was taken... *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:10:54 PM
519 Views
if there is no oath of fidelity then straying would not be immoral *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:40:53 PM
488 Views
It's not immoral to break the marriage contract.
- 12/10/2010 08:19:50 PM
1181 Views
That must be why they have you sign something called an agreementory note 
*NM*
- 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM
564 Views
*NM*
- 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM
564 Views
I don't think it's immoral at all. The contract usually specifies penalties for breach.
- 12/10/2010 05:28:34 PM
1165 Views
You didn't mention the third party
- 12/10/2010 08:26:56 PM
944 Views
in a way I did since I did mention society
- 12/10/2010 08:54:07 PM
1092 Views
What if you look at it from the other perspective?
- 12/10/2010 09:00:20 PM
1126 Views
Sure, you could do that.
- 13/10/2010 01:54:55 AM
1107 Views
The problem is that you're buying something today and paying for it for the next 15/30/50 years.
- 13/10/2010 03:04:26 PM
1011 Views
As a professional in financial services - no, it is not.
- 13/10/2010 01:44:18 AM
1049 Views
but almost nobody sees it that way
- 13/10/2010 12:53:25 PM
1043 Views
Is the deal that if you default, the bank gets the house and nothing else, though?
- 13/10/2010 02:40:48 PM
1031 Views
I think it's morally wrong to walk away from credit card debt. *NM*
- 13/10/2010 09:43:11 PM
481 Views
I agree, what do you think is different?
- 13/10/2010 09:59:36 PM
1051 Views
The difference is that the bank owns the house. Whereas when I buy stuff, it's mine. *NM*
- 19/10/2010 07:05:34 PM
479 Views
I too am unable to work out what distinguishes the two situations.
- 13/10/2010 11:54:15 PM
1007 Views
I lost sleep over it, but I did it anyway.
- 13/10/2010 05:24:19 AM
1145 Views
Obviously, the essential difference is can't pay versus won't pay.
- 13/10/2010 02:16:07 PM
1031 Views
are you socializing your debt when it is a private bank?
- 13/10/2010 03:14:48 PM
1093 Views
You are when said bank requires a bailout. And very many of them do.
- 13/10/2010 03:22:59 PM
1026 Views
I really don't understand a system where this could be an advantage.
- 13/10/2010 11:16:57 PM
1046 Views
There's generally something like a 7 or 10 year limit on credit reporting here.
- 13/10/2010 11:46:58 PM
1077 Views
What's the use of suing someone who has no money? *NM*
- 13/10/2010 11:48:47 PM
549 Views
You can garnish their wages.
- 13/10/2010 11:49:36 PM
1050 Views
With parsley?
- 13/10/2010 11:51:37 PM
1116 Views
No, "someone" most certainly did not, wicked young Miss! Hmph! *NM*
- 13/10/2010 11:52:40 PM
530 Views
If they suddenly come into some, you're entitled to it. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 12:07:34 AM
604 Views
Bit of a long shot. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 12:09:12 AM
483 Views
Very. Best to cover your bases though. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 10:04:25 PM
501 Views
Not if the doctrine of election applies.
- 14/10/2010 10:14:07 PM
1027 Views
Are we not talking about credit companies going after people who owe them money?
- 14/10/2010 10:18:47 PM
1074 Views
I am currently in that situation...
- 14/10/2010 05:03:23 AM
1159 Views
In Washington you can contest the assessed value used to determine property taxes.
- 14/10/2010 07:27:02 AM
1095 Views
it is easy for me and others to be glib when it is just a theory *NM*
- 14/10/2010 08:19:16 PM
485 Views
If you have the ability to pay, I would consider it yet another immoral act in an immoral industry.
- 14/10/2010 07:49:38 AM
1096 Views