Active Users:882 Time:29/01/2026 12:54:46 PM
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM
It's an empty placeholder for an explanation. Science at least provides a partial explanation of the unknown by describing the boundaries of what we know. If you say the soul is whatever human qualities haven't yet been discovered by science, then the soul theory is falsified every time a scientific discovery about humanity is made.


I'm just saying a soul is an explanation, if an unprovable one (as things stand). Think of it less as a "scientific theory" and more of a "philosophic idea"
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 960 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 304 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 288 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 290 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 785 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 699 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 704 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 642 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 706 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 705 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 840 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 290 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 703 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 694 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 732 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 749 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 281 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 662 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 707 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 312 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 289 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 290 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 296 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 289 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 304 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 293 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 612 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 270 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 291 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 276 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 677 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 663 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 692 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 738 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 651 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 629 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 694 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 269 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 265 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 909 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 610 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 809 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 792 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 636 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 746 Views

Reply to Message