Active Users:685 Time:18/03/2026 06:47:26 AM
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM
It's an empty placeholder for an explanation. Science at least provides a partial explanation of the unknown by describing the boundaries of what we know. If you say the soul is whatever human qualities haven't yet been discovered by science, then the soul theory is falsified every time a scientific discovery about humanity is made.


I'm just saying a soul is an explanation, if an unprovable one (as things stand). Think of it less as a "scientific theory" and more of a "philosophic idea"
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 985 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 310 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 297 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 297 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 804 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 714 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 724 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 662 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 723 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 717 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 858 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 296 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 722 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 710 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 752 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 768 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 287 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 683 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 721 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 319 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 297 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 298 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 302 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 299 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 310 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 301 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 627 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 275 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 297 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 283 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 697 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 684 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 709 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 755 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 672 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 656 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 712 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 277 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 270 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 927 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 629 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 833 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 808 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 656 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 767 Views

Reply to Message