Because I would really like to know.
Who's bad?
I'm bad.
*MySmiley*
I'm bad.
*MySmiley*
Can we swear at RAFO?
- 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
1082 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
- 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
706 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
- 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
727 Views
I can't think of underage users
- 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
780 Views
Well
- 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
786 Views
That's a good point of course
- 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
698 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
- 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
810 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
357 Views
Back off!
*NM*
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
- 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
770 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
- 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
621 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
- 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
804 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
- 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
705 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
- 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
815 Views
Subroutines such as what?
- 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
1037 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
- 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
1059 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
- 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
684 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
- 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
725 Views
well...
- 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
734 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
714 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
694 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
- 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
770 Views
new people is not the same as children. 
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
348 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
348 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
- 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
735 Views
Please.
- 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
739 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games? 
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
692 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
692 Views
I resent that.
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
609 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
609 Views
*NM*
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry. 
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
792 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
792 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
- 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
680 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
- 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
773 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
- 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
707 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
- 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
700 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. 
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
852 Views
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
852 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
- 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
736 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
- 22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
667 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
- 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
367 Views
Hey there!
- 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
897 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
- 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
778 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
338 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
338 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
- 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
668 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
704 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
704 Views