Active Users:638 Time:03/08/2025 01:51:02 PM
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld> Joel Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
It was the family friendly argument at WOT that brought the swear filter. We've been rather open about it here at RAFO so far, at least until someone takes it to ridiculous degrees. I don't get what the difference between f*ck and fuck's supposed to be anyway.


Places of work, schools etc can have firewalls that block sites without swear filters or stop people going onto the messageboard if it has swearing in post titles (I recall that giving people problems at wotmania, where words that weren't caught in the swear filter were enough to be blocked by school networks, "sex" for example stopped someone, Tim it might even have been, from going to the Comm boardif it was in a post title)

Basically the difference is that the former is much less likely to stop someone being able to access the site, which is probably not a bad thing if people want the site to survive and grow;)

Then again, we won't make people write "S*x survey" as subject line to avoid collisions with filters, so it seems to work with the way it's handled right now. At least I think we didn't hear anything about someone being unable to access the site regularly. And people at school should pay attention anyway, not surf the net :approve:

I'm still not convinced how well it's "working" though. The proof is in the newbs, I think; wotmania was around long enough that most of its members are Big People who can access it from home if they so desire, but God alone knows how this is affecting young potential RAFOlk. Thank goodness for ToM, I say, because it seems pretty clear much of our newbs (and most of our recent content) can be traced directly to that source. Who knows who's missing though? Seems like a big risk for a new site to take, IMHO, unless it intends to survive solely on former wotmaniacs.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1050 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 674 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 701 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 378 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 572 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 397 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 353 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 345 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 757 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 759 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 674 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 800 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld> - 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM 783 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 623 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 677 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 558 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 685 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 412 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 746 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 597 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 766 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 679 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 790 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1004 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1018 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 657 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 701 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 715 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 688 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 664 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 742 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 338 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 705 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 709 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 586 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 353 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 753 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 682 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 673 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 827 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 713 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 683 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 728 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 746 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 729 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 358 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 871 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 612 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 616 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 237 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 754 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 329 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 646 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 681 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 559 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 669 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 611 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 672 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 657 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 688 Views

Reply to Message