That second clause does not logically follow from the first.
Joel Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 02:39:55 PM
Once again, what percentage of current RAFO activity would you say is the direct result of something from which the site has been consciously and openly moving away since before it existed? Just because a given decision has been made does not automatically mean that it's beneficial. But it is what it is, as the kids say; I hope sustainability isn't being comprompised, because whether it is or it isn't there's no desire to change. Whether it's global warming or US politics it seems I confront that phenomenon everywhere I go these days.... 
I'm just a member though, and wouldn't have it any other way: I may worry about this stuff, but dealing with it is not my reponsibility.

I'm just a member though, and wouldn't have it any other way: I may worry about this stuff, but dealing with it is not my reponsibility.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Can we swear at RAFO?
22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
- 1052 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
- 674 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 702 Views
I can't think of underage users
22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
- 758 Views
Well
22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
- 760 Views
That's a good point of course
22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
- 675 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
- 783 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
- 347 Views
That second clause does not logically follow from the first.
22/11/2010 02:39:55 PM
- 606 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
- 747 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
- 598 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
- 766 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
- 679 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
- 790 Views
Subroutines such as what?
22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
- 1004 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
- 1018 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
- 657 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
- 701 Views
well...
23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
- 715 Views
Re: well...
23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
- 689 Views
Re: well...
23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
- 664 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
- 742 Views
new people is not the same as children.
*NM*
23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
- 339 Views

True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
- 706 Views
Please.
23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
- 709 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games?
23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
- 668 Views

I resent that.
23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
- 586 Views

Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry.
23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
- 772 Views

the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
- 655 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
- 746 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
- 682 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
- 673 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk.
22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
- 827 Views

Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
- 713 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
- 642 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
- 358 Views
Hey there!
22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
- 872 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
- 755 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help
*NM*
23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
- 330 Views

All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
- 647 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
- 682 Views
