Active Users:332 Time:17/06/2025 06:00:33 PM
That second clause does not logically follow from the first. Joel Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 02:39:55 PM
Once again, what percentage of current RAFO activity would you say is the direct result of something from which the site has been consciously and openly moving away since before it existed? Just because a given decision has been made does not automatically mean that it's beneficial. But it is what it is, as the kids say; I hope sustainability isn't being comprompised, because whether it is or it isn't there's no desire to change. Whether it's global warming or US politics it seems I confront that phenomenon everywhere I go these days.... :[

I'm just a member though, and wouldn't have it any other way: I may worry about this stuff, but dealing with it is not my reponsibility.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1040 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 664 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 690 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 374 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 560 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 391 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 348 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 339 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 746 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 749 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 663 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 788 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld> - 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM 774 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM* - 22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM 342 Views
That second clause does not logically follow from the first. - 22/11/2010 02:39:55 PM 592 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 611 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 666 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 547 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 669 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 408 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 732 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 584 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 745 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 667 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 778 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 988 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 996 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 644 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 690 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 702 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 676 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 651 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 730 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 335 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 691 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 698 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 576 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 351 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 745 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 673 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 661 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 817 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 701 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 672 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 717 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 728 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 718 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 352 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 860 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 601 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 607 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 225 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 744 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 325 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 631 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 671 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 549 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 656 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 597 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 657 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 645 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 679 Views

Reply to Message