Your obsessive attempts at regulation are beginning to border on the paranoid.
My parents are intelligent enough to know that anything they would have tried to install on my computer would have been circumvented within a matter of days.
EDIT: By the way, I assume you didn't have to deal with parental controls prior to your HS graduation; otherwise you'd have had trouble even registering a wotmania SN-except wotmania had a language filter, so it wasn't an issue (yet people managed to swear quite fluently). 
My parents are intelligent enough to know that anything they would have tried to install on my computer would have been circumvented within a matter of days.
The "regulation" I'm proposing wouldn't change anything except the accessibility of RAFO, which would be improved. I'm glad your folks had such faith in your judgement (or at least your ability with software) but not everyone is equally blessed.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Can we swear at RAFO?
- 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
1050 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
- 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
673 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
- 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
701 Views
I can't think of underage users
- 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
757 Views
Well
- 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
759 Views
That's a good point of course
- 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
674 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
- 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
782 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
347 Views
Back off!
*NM*
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
- 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
746 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
- 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
597 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
- 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
765 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
- 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
678 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
- 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
790 Views
Subroutines such as what?
- 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
1004 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
- 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
1018 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
- 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
657 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
- 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
701 Views
well...
- 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
715 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
688 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
664 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
- 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
742 Views
new people is not the same as children. 
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
338 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
338 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
- 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
705 Views
Please.
- 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
709 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games? 
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
667 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
667 Views
I resent that.
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
586 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
586 Views
*NM*
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry. 
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
771 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
771 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
- 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
655 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
- 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
746 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
- 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
682 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
- 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
673 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. 
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
827 Views
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
827 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
- 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
713 Views
Who said anything about regulation?
- 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM
728 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
- 22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
641 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
- 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
357 Views
Hey there!
- 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
871 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
- 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
754 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
329 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
329 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
- 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
646 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
681 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
681 Views