Active Users:645 Time:03/08/2025 01:52:33 PM
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
Mainly I'm just very leery of anything that even slightly complicates adding new members. If you recall the "taking five minutes to dl and install a small piece of software and then register a SN is too HARD111 *stamps foot*" discussions you should understand why. :P Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think RAFO can endure as a primarily wotmaniac site. Ignoring those who've left and will never return, there's too much bad blood and bitterness still, and too many people with too many real world responsibilities to spend the time online they did when they were pillars of the community. The ranks of the latter will grow, and unless there's a substantial influx of people who never knew about wotmania the site will stagnate and die: Those pillars are needed lest the whole thing collapse. Consequently, ANYTHING that prejudices that influx even slightly requires a great deal of justification to seem wise to me.

Yet, once again, I have neither the qualifications, the access nor the desire to make those kinds of decisions, and I've stated my position quite clearly, at great length, so, as noted in my Journal Entry, continuing to do feels ungrateful, disloyal and even hypocritical. The issue is settled, whether I like it or not. Anyway, I LIKE being a user free of any responsibilities save to a Code of Conduct I can't even be ACCUSED of violating since it's unstated (which will make the first siteban hard to explain... ). ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1050 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 674 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 701 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 378 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 572 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 397 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 353 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 345 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 758 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 759 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 674 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 800 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 623 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 677 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 558 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 685 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 412 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 746 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 597 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 766 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 679 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 790 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1004 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1018 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 657 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 701 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 715 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 688 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 664 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 742 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 338 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 706 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 709 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 586 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 353 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 753 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 682 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 673 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 827 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 713 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 683 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 728 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 746 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 729 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 358 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 871 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 612 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 616 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 237 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 754 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 329 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 646 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 681 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 559 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 669 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 611 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 672 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 657 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 688 Views

Reply to Message