Active Users:443 Time:04/03/2026 06:53:49 PM
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
Mainly I'm just very leery of anything that even slightly complicates adding new members. If you recall the "taking five minutes to dl and install a small piece of software and then register a SN is too HARD111 *stamps foot*" discussions you should understand why. :P Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think RAFO can endure as a primarily wotmaniac site. Ignoring those who've left and will never return, there's too much bad blood and bitterness still, and too many people with too many real world responsibilities to spend the time online they did when they were pillars of the community. The ranks of the latter will grow, and unless there's a substantial influx of people who never knew about wotmania the site will stagnate and die: Those pillars are needed lest the whole thing collapse. Consequently, ANYTHING that prejudices that influx even slightly requires a great deal of justification to seem wise to me.

Yet, once again, I have neither the qualifications, the access nor the desire to make those kinds of decisions, and I've stated my position quite clearly, at great length, so, as noted in my Journal Entry, continuing to do feels ungrateful, disloyal and even hypocritical. The issue is settled, whether I like it or not. Anyway, I LIKE being a user free of any responsibilities save to a Code of Conduct I can't even be ACCUSED of violating since it's unstated (which will make the first siteban hard to explain... ). ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1112 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 749 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 761 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 406 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 626 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 422 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 384 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 366 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 811 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 812 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 730 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 856 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 679 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 732 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 618 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 748 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 432 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 799 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 658 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 837 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 737 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 848 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1070 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1095 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 716 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 762 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 763 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 745 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 721 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 797 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 362 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 766 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 776 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 643 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 379 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 809 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 740 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 731 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 886 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 771 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 738 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 784 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 847 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 786 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 381 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 929 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 675 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 674 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 265 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 808 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 353 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 703 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 735 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 619 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 721 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 671 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 738 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 716 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 742 Views

Reply to Message