Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote.
Joel Send a noteboard - 24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM
I might be able to excuse the absent representatives, who could (though I doubt it) be unaware that the amendment had been proposed, or that the vote would be that day. It's quite possible that those who desired it played a scheduling game to make sure the vote came up when the most favorable quorum was present. Looking at the list it might not have made a difference, but to abstain while present for a vote like this is cowardly.
I can't help it though, I find the list of major nations voting for and against this ironic given how much crap many of those who voted against it take for opposing those who voted for it. The US is evil for waging that unjust Vietnam war, but guess where each of those nations aligned. It's also evil for supporting Israel despite their brutality, as well as opposing North Korea and Irans nuclear weapons programs, but guess where each of those nations came down on this issue. This is the kind of crap I mean when I say the world may not LIKE American hegemony, but when it's replaced by Chinese hegemony, with global complicity, they're going to miss our sorry butts. Much good may it do them.
I can't help it though, I find the list of major nations voting for and against this ironic given how much crap many of those who voted against it take for opposing those who voted for it. The US is evil for waging that unjust Vietnam war, but guess where each of those nations aligned. It's also evil for supporting Israel despite their brutality, as well as opposing North Korea and Irans nuclear weapons programs, but guess where each of those nations came down on this issue. This is the kind of crap I mean when I say the world may not LIKE American hegemony, but when it's replaced by Chinese hegemony, with global complicity, they're going to miss our sorry butts. Much good may it do them.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
UN votes to allow discrimination against sexual minorities (i.e. homosexuals)
- 24/11/2010 02:11:44 AM
1208 Views
Pretty appalling, but also rather unsurprising on who voted which way. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 02:32:37 AM
377 Views
Some surprises, though.
- 24/11/2010 02:52:17 AM
975 Views
I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage!
- 24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM
852 Views
Yeah, but when they brought that in they didn't have Jacob Zuma for president. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 02:35:56 PM
369 Views
I was surprised to see China there. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:06:12 AM
347 Views
Why? Their exemplary record on Civil Rights?
- 24/11/2010 08:08:57 PM
866 Views
When you return from vacationing in the land of False Dichotomy, let me know.
- 24/11/2010 11:36:08 PM
741 Views
Re: Oh yeah.
- 25/11/2010 12:13:28 AM
758 Views
As noted, the difference is we don't execute people for it, nor condone those who do.
- 25/11/2010 01:01:47 PM
985 Views
When I don't have to explain the Fourth Amendment to you, lecture me on your lectures.
- 25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
970 Views
- 25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
970 Views
Very sad if not a shock. Democracy doesn't work people!
- 24/11/2010 11:23:42 AM
873 Views
The Law and Justice isn't in power anymore on any level, remember?
- 24/11/2010 02:29:41 PM
917 Views
Very simplistic generalisation here, perhaps you should correct it *NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:08:54 PM
461 Views
He said "tend to", not "are". *NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:11:47 PM
485 Views
It was the inference at a continent level, that I felt was very simplistic.
- 24/11/2010 07:17:28 PM
810 Views
Generalizations are inherently simplified; that doesn't make them inaccurate.
- 24/11/2010 09:07:24 PM
874 Views
It is correct, thank you for your concern though
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM
365 Views
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM
365 Views
I disagree
- 24/11/2010 08:10:11 PM
785 Views
Then you are wrong
- 24/11/2010 08:19:51 PM
772 Views
Am I wrong, or are you?
- 24/11/2010 08:28:26 PM
908 Views
You are
- 24/11/2010 08:41:35 PM
740 Views
You did not read my post completely
- 24/11/2010 08:47:07 PM
870 Views
I did
- 24/11/2010 08:56:39 PM
832 Views
Chiming in ONLY because I've gotten so much crap for generalizations over the years.
- 24/11/2010 09:07:12 PM
822 Views
How can such tiny stupid cow states have the same amount of votes we do? Disgusting. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 02:50:10 PM
374 Views
Suddenly "Political Correctness" isn't such a dirty word.
- 24/11/2010 06:50:06 PM
870 Views
I always thought that political correctness was where people used euphemisms
- 24/11/2010 07:15:16 PM
816 Views
In practice it usually means they use non-offensive meaningless euphemisms lest someone object.
- 24/11/2010 08:25:24 PM
908 Views
Implying that people are acceptable the way they seems to be politically correct.
- 24/11/2010 09:22:58 PM
899 Views
definitely. So many people are plain rude and try to justify it with being "more honest"
- 25/11/2010 03:00:42 AM
874 Views
Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote.
- 24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM
894 Views
Do you ever get tired of your hyperbole?
- 24/11/2010 09:48:21 PM
888 Views
Of course not, it's a legitimate rhetorical device if not used (or taken) literally.
- 25/11/2010 12:38:55 PM
1017 Views
Biggest surprise is Chavez. Going against Ahmadinejad, Hu, and Putin? Guess he didn't get the memo. *NM*
- 25/11/2010 03:36:04 AM
471 Views
it is? I didn't see it as a big suprise
- 25/11/2010 11:03:40 AM
971 Views
If you don't stop saying things with which I agree I'm going to think one of us is sick.
- 25/11/2010 01:10:27 PM
1215 Views
- 25/11/2010 01:10:27 PM
1215 Views
