Active Users:761 Time:13/06/2026 11:34:35 PM
photsynthesis using arsnic hmm I am going to have to check this out dacole Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 05:07:22 AM
My training is in biochemistry so this should be quite interesting...wow if we found exterestial life..even if it was just bacteria oh boy would THAT change everything...

NASA Sets News Conference on Astrobiology Discovery; Science Journal Has Embargoed Details Until 2 p.m. EST On Dec. 2


WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.

The news conference will be held at the NASA Headquarters auditorium at 300 E St. SW, in Washington. It will be broadcast live on NASA Television and streamed on the agency's website at http://www.nasa.gov.

Participants are:
- Mary Voytek, director, Astrobiology Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington
- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
- Pamela Conrad, astrobiologist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
- Steven Benner, distinguished fellow, Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Gainesville, Fla.
- James Elser, professor, Arizona State University, Tempe

Media representatives may attend the conference or ask questions by phone or from participating NASA locations. To obtain dial-in information, journalists must send their name, affiliation and telephone number to Steve Cole at stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov or call 202-358-0918 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              202-358-0918      end_of_the_skype_highlighting by noon Dec. 2.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1245 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 686 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 836 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 341 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 330 Views
photsynthesis using arsnic hmm I am going to have to check this out - 30/11/2010 05:07:22 AM 825 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 728 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 865 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 781 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 770 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 680 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 811 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 345 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 283 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 682 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 727 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 662 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 857 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 797 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 752 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 879 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 325 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 291 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 727 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 827 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 741 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 934 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 726 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1034 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 710 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 949 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 657 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 846 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 734 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 702 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 654 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 699 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 813 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 750 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 298 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 733 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 682 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 302 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 693 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 675 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 692 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 269 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 279 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 275 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 656 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 759 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 281 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 294 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 807 Views

Reply to Message