Active Users:653 Time:14/06/2026 12:40:26 AM
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. Tom Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM
No life other than us makes it easier to say that the emergence of life in the universe was an accident, a one-off sort of thing that happened for no reason despite our best efforts to impute a reason.

Life everywhere makes life seem like a natural progression of the growth of the universe. If sentient life exists elsewhere, then sentience is a natural goal of the universe, which may support the idea that conscious existence is something the universe is striving for.

Combine that with the cyclical reality that is presupposed by the "echoes of pre-Big Bang events" that removes the linear isolation of the universe and you have a much richer reality being hinted at.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1245 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 686 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 836 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 341 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 331 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 728 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 865 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 782 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 770 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 681 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 812 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 345 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 283 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 682 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 727 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 663 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 858 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 798 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 754 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 880 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 326 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 292 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 728 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 828 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 742 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 935 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 726 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1035 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 711 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 950 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 658 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 847 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 735 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 703 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 655 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 700 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 813 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 751 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 299 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 734 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 682 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 303 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 694 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 676 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 693 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 269 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 280 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 276 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 657 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 760 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 281 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 295 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 808 Views

Reply to Message