Active Users:229 Time:17/05/2024 02:27:33 AM
Because they just hosted it in 2002. Brian Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 08:54:16 PM
When the other options for 2022 are Qatar, Japan, and South Korea, then I would say that Australia and the U.S. look great in comparison.

Korea and Japan have pretty good teams and they've been doing better than people expect them to in the last few WCs. Qatar... please no.

If it wasn't for that, then I'd say they were solid candidates.
Reply to message
2018 and 2022 World Cup predictions - 01/12/2010 01:24:15 AM 696 Views
I'm hoping on the Netherlands/Belgium bid for 2018, and Australia for 2022. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:35:39 AM 209 Views
Portugal/Spain for 2018 and Australia 2022 *NM* - 01/12/2010 07:16:24 AM 232 Views
I think you are right - 01/12/2010 01:03:05 PM 481 Views
Re: I think you are right - 01/12/2010 06:39:09 PM 625 Views
You do realize Mexico has hosted not one, but two World Cups, right? *NM* - 01/12/2010 07:56:35 PM 226 Views
Yes - 01/12/2010 09:08:44 PM 562 Views
Maybe your view in the US is a bit tainted. - 01/12/2010 10:18:20 PM 563 Views
Probably - 01/12/2010 10:31:34 PM 556 Views
Re: I think you are right - 01/12/2010 10:32:10 PM 462 Views
Why would anyone vote for Australia? - 01/12/2010 06:03:15 PM 458 Views
Because, out of all the choices for the 2022 Cup, the U.S. and Australia are the best choices - 01/12/2010 06:32:08 PM 470 Views
Why would you say that? - 01/12/2010 07:48:42 PM 473 Views
Because they just hosted it in 2002. - 01/12/2010 08:54:16 PM 624 Views
Your opinion that Australia is better than Japan and SK doesn't seem to be based on facts. - 01/12/2010 07:59:14 PM 432 Views
It's based on reality - 01/12/2010 09:13:20 PM 660 Views
Right, right - 02/12/2010 04:28:32 AM 464 Views
Lol. - 02/12/2010 06:27:14 AM 464 Views
I'll admit, I came on a bit strong in that post - 02/12/2010 07:30:21 AM 450 Views

Reply to Message