Active Users:388 Time:02/05/2025 05:13:42 AM
Ah, we seem to have a misunderstanding then, your post was a bit confusing. Legolas Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 10:21:08 PM
I was under the assumption that you were implying Australia and the US had far better national teams than the other three candidates, considering the way you phrased that. If it's just chances to get to host the tournament you were talking about, then obviously I agree Japan nor South Korea will get it.
Reply to message
2018 and 2022 World Cup predictions - 01/12/2010 01:24:15 AM 836 Views
I'm hoping on the Netherlands/Belgium bid for 2018, and Australia for 2022. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:35:39 AM 260 Views
Portugal/Spain for 2018 and Australia 2022 *NM* - 01/12/2010 07:16:24 AM 284 Views
I think you are right - 01/12/2010 01:03:05 PM 600 Views
Re: I think you are right - 01/12/2010 06:39:09 PM 739 Views
You do realize Mexico has hosted not one, but two World Cups, right? *NM* - 01/12/2010 07:56:35 PM 280 Views
Yes - 01/12/2010 09:08:44 PM 691 Views
Maybe your view in the US is a bit tainted. - 01/12/2010 10:18:20 PM 703 Views
Probably - 01/12/2010 10:31:34 PM 691 Views
Re: I think you are right - 01/12/2010 10:32:10 PM 580 Views
Why would anyone vote for Australia? - 01/12/2010 06:03:15 PM 577 Views
Because, out of all the choices for the 2022 Cup, the U.S. and Australia are the best choices - 01/12/2010 06:32:08 PM 588 Views
Why would you say that? - 01/12/2010 07:48:42 PM 599 Views
Because they just hosted it in 2002. - 01/12/2010 08:54:16 PM 751 Views
Your opinion that Australia is better than Japan and SK doesn't seem to be based on facts. - 01/12/2010 07:59:14 PM 552 Views
It's based on reality - 01/12/2010 09:13:20 PM 763 Views
Ah, we seem to have a misunderstanding then, your post was a bit confusing. - 01/12/2010 10:21:08 PM 568 Views
Right, right - 02/12/2010 04:28:32 AM 591 Views
Lol. - 02/12/2010 06:27:14 AM 600 Views
I'll admit, I came on a bit strong in that post - 02/12/2010 07:30:21 AM 570 Views

Reply to Message