The bacteria in question is part of a known lineage
Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 08:07:34 PM
Looking at the periodic table, phosphorus and arsenic don't seem that different since they have the same amount of electrons on their outermost shell. So the only difference in this bacteria is that P becomes As in the nucleotide (made of arsenic..)? How is that possible? Is the bacteria something that has been around for ages, or something that just developed, or something alien?
So I would bet - and this is just pure speculation on the part of a lowly undergrad - that it probably started out like normal organisms (using phosphorus) and then it adapted the ability to use arsenic as a survival mechanism in the arsenic rich environment of Mono.
I did get to see the end of the press conference, and they addressed the age question ... mostly by saying they don't really know and further study is necessary.
But she did say that while probably not all of the phosphorus in the organism was replaced by arsenic, there simply was not enough phosphorus in the samples to support life as we know it using phosphorus, so clearly arsenic is taking the place of phosphorus not only in DNA but also in membranes and ribosomes and stuff like that. They were talking about how they need to do more work to find out what the pattern is or the ratios and the mechanism and stuff like that. So many exciting future studies!! 
One interesting thing they mentioned (though two of the scientists kind of argued about it a little ... lol) was that mono-Arsenic nucleotides (the analogue of the nucleotides in DNA) form spontaneously in test-tubes at room temperature while the phosphate version requires an enzyme catalyzed reaction. Interesting!
Insert theme music here.
More Important Than Soccer: Completely new type of DNA discovered
- 02/12/2010 04:48:51 PM
1765 Views
Wow. *NM*
- 02/12/2010 05:32:08 PM
549 Views
that is TOTALLY inappropriate
- 02/12/2010 04:58:47 PM
976 Views
Crazy awesome.
- 02/12/2010 05:07:49 PM
1041 Views
So the movie Evolution was real!
- 02/12/2010 05:24:16 PM
959 Views
Wow. *NM*
- 02/12/2010 05:32:08 PM
549 Views
Dang. I thought it was naturally occurring. Missed the part where it was grown in a lab.
- 03/12/2010 02:16:16 AM
1057 Views
I won't pretend I know enough about biology to understand the impact of this
- 02/12/2010 06:26:24 PM
1018 Views
It's like finding a type of rock that eats laughter
- 02/12/2010 06:51:15 PM
868 Views
... without coming down and dealing with the nasty stomach cramps.
- 02/12/2010 09:49:06 PM
1095 Views
- 02/12/2010 09:49:06 PM
1095 Views
I think I had an ex once that was made of arsenic. *NM*
- 02/12/2010 07:10:57 PM
491 Views
So, is it an alien?
- 02/12/2010 07:19:49 PM
1015 Views
They haven't mentioned anything saying it's not from Earth, I think
- 02/12/2010 08:03:44 PM
1037 Views
The bacteria in question is part of a known lineage
- 02/12/2010 08:07:34 PM
1252 Views
see my note below
- 02/12/2010 08:13:35 PM
1020 Views
Maybe
- 02/12/2010 08:23:16 PM
967 Views
So, apparently, this bacteria doesn't use arsneic for its DNA in its natural state?
- 02/12/2010 08:06:02 PM
924 Views
While awesome, it's a bit of a problem.
- 02/12/2010 09:04:22 PM
925 Views
True, but I'm not "looking for" anything in particular, so I just like it
*NM*
- 02/12/2010 11:09:21 PM
525 Views
*NM*
- 02/12/2010 11:09:21 PM
525 Views
Less cool a revelation than I was hoping, but certainly not a complete disappointment. *NM*
- 02/12/2010 10:35:33 PM
484 Views
I don't understand why this is such a big deal. It always seemed common sense to me that there are
- 02/12/2010 10:40:22 PM
1063 Views
I think it just makes them happy that they can widen the parameters for life-sustaining planets. *NM*
- 02/12/2010 11:00:31 PM
483 Views
yah. it's one thing to theorize, another thing to find something to hold true.
- 02/12/2010 11:10:23 PM
935 Views
It's much more than an educated guess.
- 02/12/2010 11:59:18 PM
1127 Views
You can't "know" from this distance.
- 03/12/2010 03:13:05 AM
841 Views
Why not?
- 03/12/2010 04:42:15 AM
1114 Views
obviously you have not learned to look at the back label on the car
*NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:04:42 PM
462 Views
*NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:04:42 PM
462 Views
Yes, we can.
- 04/12/2010 06:04:48 PM
1273 Views
The problem probably is with me.
- 04/12/2010 08:00:56 PM
918 Views
No, they aren't.
- 04/12/2010 10:01:25 PM
956 Views
Are you baiting me to bait you?
- 05/12/2010 06:41:49 AM
1127 Views
I'm just carrying on a conversation.
- 05/12/2010 07:26:39 AM
1105 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation.
- 05/12/2010 07:08:04 PM
888 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation.
- 05/12/2010 07:56:43 PM
1079 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation.
- 06/12/2010 03:15:37 AM
1046 Views
I made my students watch the NASA channel for over two hours today
- 02/12/2010 11:11:40 PM
841 Views
- 02/12/2010 11:11:40 PM
841 Views


