You don't get a refund on it, because it is being used for defense (either overtly or through intimidation). As such, you are not entitled to any such money back.
As for not paying your taxes...that is a choice you can make too. Plenty of people don't pay income taxes at all. Oddly enough...those are the same people that want me to pay for something else for them.....
~Jeordam
As for not paying your taxes...that is a choice you can make too. Plenty of people don't pay income taxes at all. Oddly enough...those are the same people that want me to pay for something else for them.....
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Federal judge in Va. strikes down health care law - 
- 13/12/2010 05:21:37 PM
1104 Views
- 13/12/2010 05:21:37 PM
1104 Views
*yawn*
- 13/12/2010 05:46:58 PM
772 Views
Another step closer to SCOTUS.....and that will be 5-4 decision in favor of repeal! 
*NM*
- 13/12/2010 05:55:54 PM
301 Views
*NM*
- 13/12/2010 05:55:54 PM
301 Views
So riddle me this...
- 13/12/2010 07:23:14 PM
757 Views
He's not "making his own law", just denying the government the ability to.....
- 13/12/2010 08:06:48 PM
735 Views
That wasn't my question.
- 13/12/2010 09:10:39 PM
823 Views
I get what you're saying...
- 13/12/2010 11:30:13 PM
823 Views
Agreed; when do I get a refund for my share of the B2 bomber?
- 14/12/2010 04:40:25 AM
758 Views
But see...you are using the B2 bomber.
- 14/12/2010 03:59:27 PM
688 Views
Much as you are using the healthcare system.
- 14/12/2010 05:55:40 PM
808 Views
*nods*
- 14/12/2010 06:09:42 PM
796 Views
Again we're back to whether individuals deign to tolerate majority rule.
- 14/12/2010 07:27:22 PM
899 Views
It's judicial review
- 14/12/2010 02:47:43 PM
779 Views
I really don't understand why people defend the forced purchase aspect
- 13/12/2010 08:22:03 PM
802 Views
This analogy no doubt has its flaws too, but I was just reminded of it...
- 13/12/2010 08:52:31 PM
815 Views
Forced insurance purchase would indeed be terribly unconstitutional.
- 14/12/2010 04:26:27 AM
724 Views
there is a major problem with this..
- 14/12/2010 01:29:41 AM
769 Views
Bad analogy.....
- 14/12/2010 02:57:28 AM
727 Views
Re: Bad analogy.....
- 14/12/2010 03:23:31 AM
738 Views
Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance.....
- 14/12/2010 03:42:26 AM
727 Views
Re: Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance.....
- 14/12/2010 04:53:39 AM
748 Views
Just to note....
- 14/12/2010 06:11:57 PM
733 Views
yeah, but the courts exist to strike down dumb legislation, which is what this ruling does
- 14/12/2010 03:17:04 AM
687 Views
No, the courts exist to interpret legislation, and the SCOTUS to strike down illegal legislation.
- 14/12/2010 04:36:59 AM
706 Views
I'll excerpt some relevant passages, but the full article is in the link.
- 14/12/2010 02:10:48 PM
887 Views
He partially owns the lobby aiming to make it unconstitutional, which the plaintiff was a client of *NM*
- 14/12/2010 05:35:21 PM
375 Views