Active Users:334 Time:02/07/2025 03:14:54 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM
I believe defilement of corpses has been pretty consistently frowned upon throughout history, though naturally there are exceptions. It may not be rape, but it's still generally unacceptable.

EDIT: In the interest of strict accuracy.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 12/01/2011 at 09:05:49 PM
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 655 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 410 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 385 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 375 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 355 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 358 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 403 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 359 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 359 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 356 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 316 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 343 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 151 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 365 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 365 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 328 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 370 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 311 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 401 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 388 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 346 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 367 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 420 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 292 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 358 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 331 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 356 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 352 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 342 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 363 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 159 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 352 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 139 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 356 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 364 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 337 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes