Active Users:701 Time:14/12/2025 12:52:41 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: No and depends snoopcester Send a noteboard - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM
I'm pretty sure the law draws a distinction between consent and coercion. Also, you're assuming a parent/child situation, which is not the sole relationship encompassed. To draw a site-related example: what about ASoIaF, with Jamie and Cersie?


Yes... but I would imagine in a family relationship it has a really hard time judging where the line is.
And no, I wasn't considering only a parent/ child relationship - I'm not sure why you assume that but I don't know why you would think it only applies to a parent/ child relationship and not to a sibling relationship.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 697 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 456 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 442 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 415 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 395 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 407 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 443 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 396 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 398 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 396 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 359 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 380 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 169 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 403 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 405 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 373 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 410 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 356 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 442 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 429 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 385 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 407 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 474 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 339 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 397 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 370 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 398 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 395 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 385 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 401 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 174 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 387 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 154 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 400 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 404 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 374 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes