And no, I wasn't considering only a parent/ child relationship - I'm not sure why you assume that
You originally said: "both in terms of grooming until that relative is old enough" - which certainly implies an age difference significant enough for the junior person to be under the authority of the senior complete enough that the junior would be willing to trust the senior blindly. AKA parent/child, though I imagine the case of a significantly older sibling would approximate the same if there were no actual parents around.
Some legal questions.
- 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM
713 Views
Yes to both
- 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM
471 Views
No and depends
- 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM
462 Views
Re: No and depends
- 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM
411 Views
Re: No and depends
- 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM
415 Views
Re: No and depends
- 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM
411 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent.
- 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM
393 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM*
- 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM
174 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family.
- 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM
419 Views
You're confusing two separate issues.
- 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM
420 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well.
- 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM
391 Views
How? Why?
- 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM
425 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized.
- 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM
373 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life.
- 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM
462 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers.
- 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM
444 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers.
- 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM
401 Views
no to both
- 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM
416 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is.
- 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM
410 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong
- 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM
405 Views
