Active Users:813 Time:15/09/2025 02:48:05 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: No and depends snoopcester Send a noteboard - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM
You originally said: "both in terms of grooming until that relative is old enough" - which certainly implies an age difference significant enough for the junior person to be under the authority of the senior complete enough that the junior would be willing to trust the senior blindly. AKA parent/child, though I imagine the case of a significantly older sibling would approximate the same if there were no actual parents around.


I did say that but I didn't and don't see it as implying an age gap of any significant sort.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 675 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 433 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 413 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 393 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 374 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 382 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 422 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 377 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 379 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 375 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 338 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 361 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 160 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 383 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 384 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 353 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 388 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 331 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 420 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 406 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 365 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 385 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 440 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 316 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 378 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 353 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 375 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 373 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 363 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 382 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 167 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 370 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 145 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 379 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 382 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 355 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes