Active Users:274 Time:22/05/2024 12:28:09 AM
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM
Former leading Bush evangelical megachurch pastor/guy who did crystal meth with gay prostitutes Ted Haggard is featured in the February issue of Gentlemen’s Quarterly, so that gentlemen can remove their top hats and waist coats, sit down at the chair with some light reading, and laugh at him. “I cried when the Chilean miners got rescued. I cry when I watch Undercover Boss. I cry at anything that shows people being people. I’m a wreck,” he says. Sure. And then there’s stuff like this, of course: “We never had sex sex… I bought drugs and a massage from him, and he masturbated me at the end of it. That’s it.” Oh, and: “I think that probably, if I were 21 in this society, I would identify myself as a bisexual.”

He says that despite popular perception, he was never a right-wing power broker in the vein of Jerry Falwell. His reported weekly chats with George W. Bush were usually just briefings with low-level White House staff. He was never a homophobe, either, he says, and though he supported a 2006 amendment outlawing gay marriage in Colorado, he was also in favor of a ballot measure that would have extended domestic-partner benefits to same-sex couples.

The ol’ smoking-meth-out-of-a-gay-prostitute’s-anus triangulation.

Speaking of meth:

“Sometimes I’d throw it away,” he says. “Other times, I’d go someplace and masturbate and use it. But it was for masturbation. And that’s one of the reasons why I haven’t been real clear. I don’t want to stand up publicly and say, ‘Hey, I’m a masturbation guy!’

Everyone needs meth to masturbate. That’s how masturbation works.

“Anyway, I’m reading Romans. I just finished with Matthew, which is all Jesus, so I thought I’d harden that up with some Paul.”

Ted Harggard: hardening up with some Paul. [GQ]
I amuse myself.
I don't have anything to add here.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1187 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 473 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 437 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 708 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 440 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 624 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 697 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 679 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 873 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 402 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 987 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 344 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 763 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 636 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 727 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 657 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 888 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 842 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 718 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 375 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 748 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 915 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 653 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 616 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1042 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 785 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 398 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 797 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 589 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 401 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 634 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 778 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 660 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 804 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 576 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 771 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 654 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 765 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 380 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 570 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 403 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 618 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 415 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 707 Views

Reply to Message