So I will merely say that a large part of the Christian faith focuses on exactly that - resisting the temptations of the flesh.
Celibacy is celibacy, among heterosexual or homosexual people. But when most denominations of Christianity allow heterosexual people to give in to the "temptations of the flesh" as long as they do it within marriage, while denying homosexual people that possibility, yes, well, then it's kind of hypocritical for them to talk about "resisting the temptations of the flesh" when they do no such thing themselves.
Christian values only prohibit heterosexual sex OUTSIDE of marriage. Not within marriage. Where's the hypocrisy if you do exactly as your faith tells you to?
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old
- 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM
1426 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM
550 Views
It was something that made me laugh?
- 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM
945 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM
556 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard"
- 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM
864 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care
- 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM
939 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM
454 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle...
- 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM
1015 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human
- 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM
921 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here...
- 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM
969 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex.
- 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM
886 Views
Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM
1133 Views
Re: Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM
1071 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed...
- 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
956 Views
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly.
- 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM
851 Views
I completely and utterly disagree
- 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM
892 Views
The carnal nature of the flesh just happens to be the way we're all innately broken.
- 27/01/2011 11:30:09 PM
1060 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away.
- 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM
854 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM
496 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But...
- 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM
1045 Views
I was thinking along the lines of Christans who are gay or or believe in gay rights.
- 27/01/2011 09:29:50 PM
912 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim.
- 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM
901 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? 
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
1022 Views
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
1022 Views
Don't even know what that means. 
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
803 Views
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
803 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism
- 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM
1000 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know.
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
875 Views
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
875 Views
Point of emphasis.
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
986 Views
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
986 Views
Agreed. *NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
483 Views
*NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
483 Views
Then I'm confused, either about what you believe or how you reconcile it with my second paragraph.
- 28/01/2011 10:54:13 PM
1088 Views
At the risk of simplifying: All roads don't lead to Cleveland, nor do they lead to God.
- 01/02/2011 03:47:57 PM
1136 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies
- 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM
807 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much"
- 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM
869 Views
This guy needs serious mental help, in my humble laymans opinion.
- 27/01/2011 11:42:00 PM
897 Views