Active Users:2629 Time:20/06/2026 03:32:38 AM
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... Shannow Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
Christian values only prohibit heterosexual sex OUTSIDE of marriage. Not within marriage. Where's the hypocrisy if you do exactly as your faith tells you to?

The hypocrisy is in making it possible for some people to use that way around the prohibition, and not for others. If "the temptations of the flesh" are perfectly fine when they happen within marriage, then they should be just as fine when they happen between those who would be married if they weren't arbitrarily denied the right to do so.


There is no argument. The rules are indeed arbitrary. That's the whole point.

One act is saved specifically for marriage. The other is prohibited altogether. Either accept it or don't follow that particular faith. Simple as that.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1498 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 619 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 589 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 1009 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 587 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 940 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 1008 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 969 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1208 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 539 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1303 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 487 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 1101 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 990 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 1037 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 953 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1201 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 1142 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 1021 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 509 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 1068 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1221 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 963 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 929 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1346 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 1064 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 522 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 1119 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 878 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 543 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 919 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 1103 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 970 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 1103 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 863 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 1082 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 951 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 1059 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 517 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 879 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 589 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 969 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 556 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 1032 Views

Reply to Message