Active Users:625 Time:03/08/2025 03:45:34 PM
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly. Legolas Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM
If you're going to tell gay people to suck it up because Christianity can't and won't tolerate them, you could at least say so straightforwardly instead of talking about "temptations of the flesh". Though I suppose you just did that, so that's a nice end to the conversation, then.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1361 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 544 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 509 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 871 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 513 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 807 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 854 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 837 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1040 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 468 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1160 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 412 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 938 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 845 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 895 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 823 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1073 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 1008 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 888 Views
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly. - 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM 763 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 445 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 909 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1073 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 815 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 781 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1203 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 942 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 464 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 967 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 753 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 465 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 788 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 947 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 825 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 964 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 744 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 936 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 813 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 915 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 440 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 743 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 496 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 783 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 472 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 864 Views

Reply to Message