But when you post subjects you know, or at least should know, are going to be controversial don't try and act like you were just making fun of the use of the word hard.
It's funny because someone who was once a very public, outspoken proponent of morality who condemned others for their sins, is now giving an interview nonchalantly talking about doing meth with male prostitutes.
The post itself doesn't insult anyone's religion, which is what you said.
Also, Shannow said she didn't see what the point of the post was, and I responded that I thought it was funny- I simply explained the pun because it seemed like you were a humorless asshole, and I wanted to help you learn.
I amuse myself.
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old
- 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM
1465 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM
569 Views
It was something that made me laugh?
- 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM
974 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM
569 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard"
- 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM
901 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care
- 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM
974 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care
- 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM
937 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM
467 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle...
- 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM
1060 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human
- 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM
956 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here...
- 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM
1004 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex.
- 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM
917 Views
Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM
1166 Views
Re: Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM
1109 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed...
- 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
987 Views
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly.
- 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM
886 Views
I completely and utterly disagree
- 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM
925 Views
The carnal nature of the flesh just happens to be the way we're all innately broken.
- 27/01/2011 11:30:09 PM
1098 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away.
- 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM
888 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM
507 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But...
- 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM
1082 Views
I was thinking along the lines of Christans who are gay or or believe in gay rights.
- 27/01/2011 09:29:50 PM
949 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim.
- 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM
933 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? 
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
1063 Views
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
1063 Views
Don't even know what that means. 
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
830 Views
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
830 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism
- 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM
1042 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know.
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
916 Views
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
916 Views
Point of emphasis.
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
1024 Views
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
1024 Views
Agreed. *NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
499 Views
*NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
499 Views
Then I'm confused, either about what you believe or how you reconcile it with my second paragraph.
- 28/01/2011 10:54:13 PM
1122 Views
At the risk of simplifying: All roads don't lead to Cleveland, nor do they lead to God.
- 01/02/2011 03:47:57 PM
1173 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies
- 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM
844 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much"
- 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM
917 Views
This guy needs serious mental help, in my humble laymans opinion.
- 27/01/2011 11:42:00 PM
930 Views